Section I of this Note discusses the case’s procedural history. Section II discusses the Cassirer family story and looks at the history of America’s legislative efforts aimed at impacting Holocaust-era art restitution litigation since the end of WWII. Section III discusses the Ninth Circuit’s application of HEAR and compares it to subsequent interpretations of the Act. Lastly, section IV discusses changes that Congress could make to HEAR that would help ensure that the Act has the impact that the legislature intended
During World War II, hundreds of thousands of works of art were confiscated by Nazis under the direc...
The Nazis engaged in widespread art looting from Holocaust victims, either taking the artwork outrig...
Holocaust Restitution is the first volume to present the Holocaust restitution movement directly fro...
Section I of this Note discusses the case’s procedural history. Section II discusses the Cassirer fa...
The author of this article presents a legal analysis of the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act ...
The Holocaust Expropriated Recovery Act of 2016 (HEAR) purports to extend the statute of limitations...
It is estimated that over 20% of the art in Europe was looted by the Nazi regime during World War II...
From 1933 to 1945, Nazi German forces executed a mass campaign of property confiscation, stealing as...
In the 2014 case of Meyer v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Okla., victims of looting asked a court ...
I joined Christie\u27s a little over a year ago as Director of Restitution, coordinating Christie\u2...
(Excerpt) The unusual circumstances surrounding the recent return of the Geldorp portrait to a publi...
This Comment contends that jurisdiction over Austria cannot be established retroactively by applicat...
Eight decades after the Holocaust, many pieces of art stolen from Jewish families still sit in the s...
Restitution of Nazi-looted art in the United States is a complicated legal and policy issue. Victims...
In this Article we have attempted to provide an overview of the Nazi-looted art cases in their histo...
During World War II, hundreds of thousands of works of art were confiscated by Nazis under the direc...
The Nazis engaged in widespread art looting from Holocaust victims, either taking the artwork outrig...
Holocaust Restitution is the first volume to present the Holocaust restitution movement directly fro...
Section I of this Note discusses the case’s procedural history. Section II discusses the Cassirer fa...
The author of this article presents a legal analysis of the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act ...
The Holocaust Expropriated Recovery Act of 2016 (HEAR) purports to extend the statute of limitations...
It is estimated that over 20% of the art in Europe was looted by the Nazi regime during World War II...
From 1933 to 1945, Nazi German forces executed a mass campaign of property confiscation, stealing as...
In the 2014 case of Meyer v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Okla., victims of looting asked a court ...
I joined Christie\u27s a little over a year ago as Director of Restitution, coordinating Christie\u2...
(Excerpt) The unusual circumstances surrounding the recent return of the Geldorp portrait to a publi...
This Comment contends that jurisdiction over Austria cannot be established retroactively by applicat...
Eight decades after the Holocaust, many pieces of art stolen from Jewish families still sit in the s...
Restitution of Nazi-looted art in the United States is a complicated legal and policy issue. Victims...
In this Article we have attempted to provide an overview of the Nazi-looted art cases in their histo...
During World War II, hundreds of thousands of works of art were confiscated by Nazis under the direc...
The Nazis engaged in widespread art looting from Holocaust victims, either taking the artwork outrig...
Holocaust Restitution is the first volume to present the Holocaust restitution movement directly fro...