The question of constitutional theory in state courts often results in a comparative analysis of the state and federal constitutions. Typically where a comparative analysis is used, the purpose is to support the authority of the state court to interpret the state document independently and to justify an interpretation and result that diverge from federal precedent. While this approach may add to the persuasiveness of the opinion, it does little to advance the role of state courts in the dialogue of constitutionalism. The critical tension in state constitutionalism is between the need to persuade critics that the state court is justified when it diverges from federal precedent, and the goal of having a voice in constitutional discourse and d...
Constitutional Theory is at the center of legal and political debates in the United States. In recen...
The constitution is that the federal courts and a majority of state court systems will only entertai...
This Article provides a counterbalance to current trends in the constitutional interpretation debate...
In the American constitutional tradition, federalism is commonly understood as a mechanism designed ...
In 1977, Justice Brennan delivered his now famous plea for a renaissance in state constitutionalism....
In confronting important constitutional issues, state courts face a range of interpretive questions,...
In a series of groundbreaking articles published over the past fifteen years, James Gardner has led ...
Notwithstanding that the new judicial federalism is no longer new, the question remains whether ther...
Courts and scholars have long sought to illuminate the relationship between state and federal consti...
It is frequently argued that state constitutions ought to be interpreted using a methodology of cons...
In State v. Gunwall the Washington Supreme Court announced six criteria that Washington courts are t...
This is an Essay about the how of constitutional interpretation. Much attention has been devoted t...
Saphire provides a detailed review and critique of the Ohio Supreme Court\u27s interpretive methodol...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
Rejecting judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation, this paper argues that understanding ...
Constitutional Theory is at the center of legal and political debates in the United States. In recen...
The constitution is that the federal courts and a majority of state court systems will only entertai...
This Article provides a counterbalance to current trends in the constitutional interpretation debate...
In the American constitutional tradition, federalism is commonly understood as a mechanism designed ...
In 1977, Justice Brennan delivered his now famous plea for a renaissance in state constitutionalism....
In confronting important constitutional issues, state courts face a range of interpretive questions,...
In a series of groundbreaking articles published over the past fifteen years, James Gardner has led ...
Notwithstanding that the new judicial federalism is no longer new, the question remains whether ther...
Courts and scholars have long sought to illuminate the relationship between state and federal consti...
It is frequently argued that state constitutions ought to be interpreted using a methodology of cons...
In State v. Gunwall the Washington Supreme Court announced six criteria that Washington courts are t...
This is an Essay about the how of constitutional interpretation. Much attention has been devoted t...
Saphire provides a detailed review and critique of the Ohio Supreme Court\u27s interpretive methodol...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
Rejecting judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation, this paper argues that understanding ...
Constitutional Theory is at the center of legal and political debates in the United States. In recen...
The constitution is that the federal courts and a majority of state court systems will only entertai...
This Article provides a counterbalance to current trends in the constitutional interpretation debate...