Add to ORKGThe order of a new trial in the injured party\u27s action against the driver was improper because there was no basis for the exercise of discretion when a correct instruction for unavoidable accident was given
In a pedestrian\u27s personal injury action, the trial court properly submitted the issue of an auto...
A judgment against a pedestrian was reversed and the driver was held negligent as a matter of law wh...
A trial court did not err in giving an instruction on continuing negligence in conjunction with an i...
The order of a new trial in the injured party\u27s action against the driver was improper because th...
The trial court erred in giving certain instructions requested by defendant because the jury should ...
A driver was entitled to a jury instruction on the doctrine of imminent peril in a pedestrian\u27s n...
Passengers who were injured in an accident while they were guests in car, just after the driver step...
The refusal to give the jury instructions that were requested by a pedestrian did not provide ground...
A jury instruction on contributory negligence with respect to an adult passenger was prejudicial whe...
Compromise verdict for passenger, her husband, and driver of husband\u27s car after first trial did ...
A deceased passenger\u27s statement that defendant caused an automobile accident was admissible in d...
The failure of the trial court to give a proposed last clear chance instruction to the jury did not ...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...
The trial court was not required to order a new trial on damage issues alone where damages awarded i...
Parents of a son\u27s killed in a collision with a train were not entitled to a new trial in their a...
In a pedestrian\u27s personal injury action, the trial court properly submitted the issue of an auto...
A judgment against a pedestrian was reversed and the driver was held negligent as a matter of law wh...
A trial court did not err in giving an instruction on continuing negligence in conjunction with an i...
The order of a new trial in the injured party\u27s action against the driver was improper because th...
The trial court erred in giving certain instructions requested by defendant because the jury should ...
A driver was entitled to a jury instruction on the doctrine of imminent peril in a pedestrian\u27s n...
Passengers who were injured in an accident while they were guests in car, just after the driver step...
The refusal to give the jury instructions that were requested by a pedestrian did not provide ground...
A jury instruction on contributory negligence with respect to an adult passenger was prejudicial whe...
Compromise verdict for passenger, her husband, and driver of husband\u27s car after first trial did ...
A deceased passenger\u27s statement that defendant caused an automobile accident was admissible in d...
The failure of the trial court to give a proposed last clear chance instruction to the jury did not ...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...
The trial court was not required to order a new trial on damage issues alone where damages awarded i...
Parents of a son\u27s killed in a collision with a train were not entitled to a new trial in their a...
In a pedestrian\u27s personal injury action, the trial court properly submitted the issue of an auto...
A judgment against a pedestrian was reversed and the driver was held negligent as a matter of law wh...
A trial court did not err in giving an instruction on continuing negligence in conjunction with an i...