Add to ORKGA verdict was proper because evidence was sufficient to infer that a college student was acting as an agent of a military school at the time he took the student, and there was substantial evidence to conclude that he negligently operated the car
The lessor of an airplane was not entitled to recover damages for the destruction of the airplane fo...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...
The refusal to give the jury instructions that were requested by a pedestrian did not provide ground...
A jury instruction on contributory negligence with respect to an adult passenger was prejudicial whe...
In a pedestrian\u27s personal injury action, the trial court properly submitted the issue of an auto...
A judgment against a school district and its staff and a denial of their motions for JNOV were impro...
Parents of a son\u27s killed in a collision with a train were not entitled to a new trial in their a...
Passengers who were injured in an accident while they were guests in car, just after the driver step...
The trial court did not err in instructing jury that it could not infer driver\u27s negligence from ...
A trial court did not err in giving an instruction on continuing negligence in conjunction with an i...
The trial court erred in giving certain instructions requested by defendant because the jury should ...
No prejudicial error existed when the jury instructions correctly informed the jury about the shoote...
A judgment against a pedestrian was reversed and the driver was held negligent as a matter of law wh...
A deceased passenger\u27s statement that defendant caused an automobile accident was admissible in d...
Dismissal of wrongful death action filed by administratrix of passenger\u27s estate was improper bec...
The lessor of an airplane was not entitled to recover damages for the destruction of the airplane fo...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...
The refusal to give the jury instructions that were requested by a pedestrian did not provide ground...
A jury instruction on contributory negligence with respect to an adult passenger was prejudicial whe...
In a pedestrian\u27s personal injury action, the trial court properly submitted the issue of an auto...
A judgment against a school district and its staff and a denial of their motions for JNOV were impro...
Parents of a son\u27s killed in a collision with a train were not entitled to a new trial in their a...
Passengers who were injured in an accident while they were guests in car, just after the driver step...
The trial court did not err in instructing jury that it could not infer driver\u27s negligence from ...
A trial court did not err in giving an instruction on continuing negligence in conjunction with an i...
The trial court erred in giving certain instructions requested by defendant because the jury should ...
No prejudicial error existed when the jury instructions correctly informed the jury about the shoote...
A judgment against a pedestrian was reversed and the driver was held negligent as a matter of law wh...
A deceased passenger\u27s statement that defendant caused an automobile accident was admissible in d...
Dismissal of wrongful death action filed by administratrix of passenger\u27s estate was improper bec...
The lessor of an airplane was not entitled to recover damages for the destruction of the airplane fo...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...
The refusal to give the jury instructions that were requested by a pedestrian did not provide ground...