Add to ORKGDefendant was due a new trial for his ex-wife\u27s murder because trial court erred by permitting him to withdraw not guilty by reason of insanity plea over counsel\u27s implied objection and because instructions to jury on lying in wait were improper
A verdict of first-degree murder was proper under the felony murder doctrine because the evidence sh...
Defendant\u27s conviction on two counts of murder was proper, even though the victims\u27 bodies wer...
Evidence of another crime, part of the same criminal act for which defendant was on trial, was admis...
First-degree murder conviction was upheld when the intent to torture was established and the jury di...
The trial court\u27s error in refusing to give instructions as to the defendant\u27s use of self-def...
A defendant\u27s murder trial did not violate due process where evidence was in form of transcript t...
Defendant\u27s conviction for first-degree murder was proper where defendant failed to show that he ...
Defendant was entitled to modification of his conviction of first degree murder to second degree mur...
A criminal defendant\u27s murder conviction was affirmed by the court because his guilt was establis...
There was no error that was ground for reversal in a defendant\u27s conviction for first-degree murd...
In murder case, the court did not have the authority to reduce defendant\u27s death sentence to life...
The trial court had the power to modify a verdict by reducing the class of defendant\u27s crime. Sub...
Defendant was properly convicted of second degree murder as the jury was correctly instructed on the...
Remarks of the prosecuting attorney were not prejudicial to defendants because of the overwhelming e...
Defendant\u27s conviction of first degree murder and sentence of the death penalty were proper becau...
A verdict of first-degree murder was proper under the felony murder doctrine because the evidence sh...
Defendant\u27s conviction on two counts of murder was proper, even though the victims\u27 bodies wer...
Evidence of another crime, part of the same criminal act for which defendant was on trial, was admis...
First-degree murder conviction was upheld when the intent to torture was established and the jury di...
The trial court\u27s error in refusing to give instructions as to the defendant\u27s use of self-def...
A defendant\u27s murder trial did not violate due process where evidence was in form of transcript t...
Defendant\u27s conviction for first-degree murder was proper where defendant failed to show that he ...
Defendant was entitled to modification of his conviction of first degree murder to second degree mur...
A criminal defendant\u27s murder conviction was affirmed by the court because his guilt was establis...
There was no error that was ground for reversal in a defendant\u27s conviction for first-degree murd...
In murder case, the court did not have the authority to reduce defendant\u27s death sentence to life...
The trial court had the power to modify a verdict by reducing the class of defendant\u27s crime. Sub...
Defendant was properly convicted of second degree murder as the jury was correctly instructed on the...
Remarks of the prosecuting attorney were not prejudicial to defendants because of the overwhelming e...
Defendant\u27s conviction of first degree murder and sentence of the death penalty were proper becau...
A verdict of first-degree murder was proper under the felony murder doctrine because the evidence sh...
Defendant\u27s conviction on two counts of murder was proper, even though the victims\u27 bodies wer...
Evidence of another crime, part of the same criminal act for which defendant was on trial, was admis...