Add to ORKGThe lessor of an airplane was not entitled to recover damages for the destruction of the airplane following a crash because there was a total absence of any evidence that the lessee was negligent or that the terms of the bailment were breached
Damages for wrongful death were the sum of those suffered by each heir or parent and when the heirs ...
Parents of a son\u27s killed in a collision with a train were not entitled to a new trial in their a...
The judgment declaring a transfer agreement void in favor of the rigging company was proper because ...
The lessor of an airplane was not entitled to recover damages for the destruction of the airplane fo...
A verdict was proper because evidence was sufficient to infer that a college student was acting as a...
On September 9, 1969, Robert W. Carey, a student pilot flying a solo cross-country flight in a plane...
It was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny the contractor leave to amend his complain...
Grant of a new trial in favor of a customer on issue of damages, in his action to recover for person...
Although there had been a breach of a real property exchange agreement because of the failure of one...
Where attorney acted as guardian of incompetent person and sold the property, negligently retained t...
Decision that nonsuited plaintiff\u27s action at close of his case was reversed where questions of f...
The trial court was not required to order a new trial on damage issues alone where damages awarded i...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...
In a case where the evidence was not clearly persuasive in favor of either party, and where there wa...
Award for the immediate harm to a property owner\u27s home was valid, but it was not possible to awa...
Damages for wrongful death were the sum of those suffered by each heir or parent and when the heirs ...
Parents of a son\u27s killed in a collision with a train were not entitled to a new trial in their a...
The judgment declaring a transfer agreement void in favor of the rigging company was proper because ...
The lessor of an airplane was not entitled to recover damages for the destruction of the airplane fo...
A verdict was proper because evidence was sufficient to infer that a college student was acting as a...
On September 9, 1969, Robert W. Carey, a student pilot flying a solo cross-country flight in a plane...
It was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny the contractor leave to amend his complain...
Grant of a new trial in favor of a customer on issue of damages, in his action to recover for person...
Although there had been a breach of a real property exchange agreement because of the failure of one...
Where attorney acted as guardian of incompetent person and sold the property, negligently retained t...
Decision that nonsuited plaintiff\u27s action at close of his case was reversed where questions of f...
The trial court was not required to order a new trial on damage issues alone where damages awarded i...
It was proper for the trial court to instruct the jury on the inference of negligence under res ipsa...
In a case where the evidence was not clearly persuasive in favor of either party, and where there wa...
Award for the immediate harm to a property owner\u27s home was valid, but it was not possible to awa...
Damages for wrongful death were the sum of those suffered by each heir or parent and when the heirs ...
Parents of a son\u27s killed in a collision with a train were not entitled to a new trial in their a...
The judgment declaring a transfer agreement void in favor of the rigging company was proper because ...