This article discusses a California case which held that a lender’s acceptance of a trustor’s payment curing default on a deed of trust reinstated the trustor’s loan, thus rendering the later nonjudicial foreclosure sale invalid
This article discusses a California case which held that a slightly premature service of notices...
This article discusses California cases where buyers successfully sued sellers for fraud, but offset...
This article discusses a California case which held that a full credit bid at foreclosure, based on ...
This article discusses a California case dealing with lender postponement and reinstatement issu...
This article discusses a California case which held that when a former property owner reacquires...
This article discusses a California case which held that neither a lender nor a trustee was liable t...
This article discusses a California case where the creditor - who had showed up one minute at its fo...
This article discusses a California case which held that a purchaser at a foreclosure sale acquires ...
This article discusses a California case holding that the trustee under a deed of trust merely acts ...
This article discusses a case involving a California lender’s duty to explore options to prevent...
This article discusses a California case where a junior creditor postponed its foreclosure proce...
This article discusses a California case which held that a buyer is not personally liable after ...
This article discusses a California case that held that moneys received by trustors in settlemen...
This article discusses a California case which held that a high bidder at a foreclosure sale, who is...
This article discusses a case which held that a mortgage broker’s agreement to indemnify its mortgag...
This article discusses a California case which held that a slightly premature service of notices...
This article discusses California cases where buyers successfully sued sellers for fraud, but offset...
This article discusses a California case which held that a full credit bid at foreclosure, based on ...
This article discusses a California case dealing with lender postponement and reinstatement issu...
This article discusses a California case which held that when a former property owner reacquires...
This article discusses a California case which held that neither a lender nor a trustee was liable t...
This article discusses a California case where the creditor - who had showed up one minute at its fo...
This article discusses a California case which held that a purchaser at a foreclosure sale acquires ...
This article discusses a California case holding that the trustee under a deed of trust merely acts ...
This article discusses a case involving a California lender’s duty to explore options to prevent...
This article discusses a California case where a junior creditor postponed its foreclosure proce...
This article discusses a California case which held that a buyer is not personally liable after ...
This article discusses a California case that held that moneys received by trustors in settlemen...
This article discusses a California case which held that a high bidder at a foreclosure sale, who is...
This article discusses a case which held that a mortgage broker’s agreement to indemnify its mortgag...
This article discusses a California case which held that a slightly premature service of notices...
This article discusses California cases where buyers successfully sued sellers for fraud, but offset...
This article discusses a California case which held that a full credit bid at foreclosure, based on ...