Add to ORKGPart I of this Note reviews California law concerning the treatment of potentially dangerous patients, including both the duty to warn and the civil commitment process.s Part II examines the impact of the Ewing decision on the therapist\u27s duty to warn. Part III proposes the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act ( LPS Act ) as a suitable framework for dealing with potentially dangerous patients that, if used correctly, obviates the need to expand the triggering criteria for the duty to warn and circumvents the negative ramifications of the Ewing decision. The Note concludes that this framework provides a superior compromise, better protecting both patient confidentiality and potential victims
A quarter of a century has passed since Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California first im...
A previous article in this Journal1 surveyed a psycho-therapist’s legal duty to warn third parties o...
When should liability be imposed upon those who fail to prevent injury or ring the alarm bell? This ...
Part I of this Note reviews California law concerning the treatment of potentially dangerous patient...
The duty of psychotherapists to warn threatened third persons of serious danger from their patients ...
In placing a legal duty to warn on the psychotherapist, the California supreme court followed the mo...
This Comment discusses the Tarasoff decisions and subsequent cases defining the scope of the psychot...
Despite the almost universal familiarity of mental health professionals with the Tarasoff case, many...
This Comment will highlight the issues of the therapist\u27s duty to warn potential victims and the ...
The Superior Court of New Jersey has held that a psychiatrist, upon a determination that his patient...
Recent events have revived questions about the circumstances that ought to trigger therapists' duty ...
The California Supreme Court, in its controversial Tarasoff decision, ruled that a psychotherapist m...
Professional counselors, spurred by the courts, have a dual ethical and legal responsibility to prot...
State laws modeled on Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California require psychotherapists t...
With the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s 1996 decision in Jaffee v. Redmond, all U.S. jurisdictions have now...
A quarter of a century has passed since Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California first im...
A previous article in this Journal1 surveyed a psycho-therapist’s legal duty to warn third parties o...
When should liability be imposed upon those who fail to prevent injury or ring the alarm bell? This ...
Part I of this Note reviews California law concerning the treatment of potentially dangerous patient...
The duty of psychotherapists to warn threatened third persons of serious danger from their patients ...
In placing a legal duty to warn on the psychotherapist, the California supreme court followed the mo...
This Comment discusses the Tarasoff decisions and subsequent cases defining the scope of the psychot...
Despite the almost universal familiarity of mental health professionals with the Tarasoff case, many...
This Comment will highlight the issues of the therapist\u27s duty to warn potential victims and the ...
The Superior Court of New Jersey has held that a psychiatrist, upon a determination that his patient...
Recent events have revived questions about the circumstances that ought to trigger therapists' duty ...
The California Supreme Court, in its controversial Tarasoff decision, ruled that a psychotherapist m...
Professional counselors, spurred by the courts, have a dual ethical and legal responsibility to prot...
State laws modeled on Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California require psychotherapists t...
With the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s 1996 decision in Jaffee v. Redmond, all U.S. jurisdictions have now...
A quarter of a century has passed since Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California first im...
A previous article in this Journal1 surveyed a psycho-therapist’s legal duty to warn third parties o...
When should liability be imposed upon those who fail to prevent injury or ring the alarm bell? This ...