In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson,! the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of sexual harassment for the first time. The Court held that when sexual harassment creates a hostile or offensive working environment, it is actionable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court interpreted Title VII as demonstrating a congressional intent to preserve the economic, psychological and emotional benefits of employment. This interpretation has been advanced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and in lower court opinions. The Supreme Court rejected the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that an employer is strictly liable for hostile environment sex discrimination regardless of the circumst...
In two decisions concerning sexual harassment, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton\u27 and Burlington Ind...
This comment will focus on the three major themes raised by these decisions: (1) whether sexual hara...
In the case of Bundy v. Jackson, the federal appellate court eliminated the need to prove tangible j...
In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson,! the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of sexual ha...
This casenote will examine Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson in light of the brief legal history of Tit...
Meritor v. Vinson marks the first time the U.S. Supreme Court recognized hostile work environment se...
Meritor v. Vinson marks the first time the U.S. Supreme Court recognized hostile work environment se...
Justice Angela Onwuachi-Willig delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents important ques...
This note discusses applicable principles and law in sexual harassment cases, including Title VII, E...
The United States Supreme Court held that an employer\u27s conduct need not seriously affect an empl...
The prohibition of employment discrimination based on sex was included in the Civil Rights Act of 19...
In two decisions concerning sexual harassment, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton\u27 and Burlington Ind...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits private employment discrimination on the basis o...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits private employment discrimination on the basis o...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits private employment discrimination on the basis o...
In two decisions concerning sexual harassment, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton\u27 and Burlington Ind...
This comment will focus on the three major themes raised by these decisions: (1) whether sexual hara...
In the case of Bundy v. Jackson, the federal appellate court eliminated the need to prove tangible j...
In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson,! the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of sexual ha...
This casenote will examine Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson in light of the brief legal history of Tit...
Meritor v. Vinson marks the first time the U.S. Supreme Court recognized hostile work environment se...
Meritor v. Vinson marks the first time the U.S. Supreme Court recognized hostile work environment se...
Justice Angela Onwuachi-Willig delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents important ques...
This note discusses applicable principles and law in sexual harassment cases, including Title VII, E...
The United States Supreme Court held that an employer\u27s conduct need not seriously affect an empl...
The prohibition of employment discrimination based on sex was included in the Civil Rights Act of 19...
In two decisions concerning sexual harassment, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton\u27 and Burlington Ind...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits private employment discrimination on the basis o...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits private employment discrimination on the basis o...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits private employment discrimination on the basis o...
In two decisions concerning sexual harassment, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton\u27 and Burlington Ind...
This comment will focus on the three major themes raised by these decisions: (1) whether sexual hara...
In the case of Bundy v. Jackson, the federal appellate court eliminated the need to prove tangible j...