Add to ORKGThis comment will examine whether Imperial extends the Board\u27s subject matter jurisdiction to include article X, section 2 violations by riparian rights owners. Board power over post-1914 appropriative rights will be examined. Next, pre-1914 appropriative rights and Imperial will be discussed. It is apparent that Imperial supports an expansion of the Board\u27s jurisdiction to include adjudication of article X, section 2 violations of riparian rights, but that such jurisdiction is not affirmatively established
The California Attorney General\u27s office is now contending in litigation that state title to the ...
Beginning in 1919 the Division of Water Resources and its predecessors, the Department of Engineerin...
Creates state water commission for control of appropriation and use of waters: defines rights in rip...
This comment will examine whether Imperial extends the Board\u27s subject matter jurisdiction to inc...
Although California courts have consistently held that riparian water rights do not attach to federa...
Conflicting demands on dwindling surface water supplies in California have led to frequent challenge...
The delicate area of state control over federal reclamation projects has been a disputed issue betwe...
The U. S. Supreme Court held in California v. United States, 98 S. Ct. 2985 (1978), that under secti...
The 1886 abstract prepared by William H. Hall of a report he would write on the question of irrigati...
California\u27s water resources system is poised at a turning point. For the first time since the gr...
This paper was part of a series of background and issue papers prepared by the staff of the Governor...
California sprang into existence following the discovery of gold in 1848. Aside from domestic use, t...
Inapplicability of the common law doctrine of riparian rights to conditions in the arid region moved...
Action by a water district to appropriate and condemn water for domestic uses from a nonnavigable la...
Document: Comments re Pacific Southwest Water Plan, submitted by Stanley Mosk, Department of Justice...
The California Attorney General\u27s office is now contending in litigation that state title to the ...
Beginning in 1919 the Division of Water Resources and its predecessors, the Department of Engineerin...
Creates state water commission for control of appropriation and use of waters: defines rights in rip...
This comment will examine whether Imperial extends the Board\u27s subject matter jurisdiction to inc...
Although California courts have consistently held that riparian water rights do not attach to federa...
Conflicting demands on dwindling surface water supplies in California have led to frequent challenge...
The delicate area of state control over federal reclamation projects has been a disputed issue betwe...
The U. S. Supreme Court held in California v. United States, 98 S. Ct. 2985 (1978), that under secti...
The 1886 abstract prepared by William H. Hall of a report he would write on the question of irrigati...
California\u27s water resources system is poised at a turning point. For the first time since the gr...
This paper was part of a series of background and issue papers prepared by the staff of the Governor...
California sprang into existence following the discovery of gold in 1848. Aside from domestic use, t...
Inapplicability of the common law doctrine of riparian rights to conditions in the arid region moved...
Action by a water district to appropriate and condemn water for domestic uses from a nonnavigable la...
Document: Comments re Pacific Southwest Water Plan, submitted by Stanley Mosk, Department of Justice...
The California Attorney General\u27s office is now contending in litigation that state title to the ...
Beginning in 1919 the Division of Water Resources and its predecessors, the Department of Engineerin...
Creates state water commission for control of appropriation and use of waters: defines rights in rip...