Overuse of medicines and medical interventions, patient safety, and rising costs are among the greatest challenges facing modern health care. Because medical malpractice systems are thought to be a driving factor, it is logical to consider alternative medical regulatory structures.1 New Zealand’s experience with no-fault compensation for medical injury and separate medical professional accountability processes may provide insights. Now that the no-fault system has been fully in place for a decade, it is timely to reflect critically on potential lessons for health systems around the world
No-fault compensation systems In a series of recent articles about no-fault compensation, CMAJ raise...
All around the world countries are trying to find a solution to deal with medical liability and pati...
Aims To discover the effect of the 2005 'no-fault' compensation reforms on medical professional acco...
As an alternative to the tort or fault-based system, a nofault compensation system has been viewed ...
The deficiencies of the tort system in handling medical negligence claims have been apparent for a n...
For decades in both Europe and the United states , the issue of compensation for victims f medical i...
An optimal compensation system should compensate injuries when they occur, but also reduce errors an...
A discussion of the work of the Scottish Government's No Fault Compensation Group.Medical practice, ...
This article highlights that medical malpractice litigation has been the focal point of the debate o...
The tort system is roundly indicted for its inadequacies in providing compensation in response to in...
The costs of litigation are large and increasing, to a level that places a drain on precious health-...
In the area of medical malpractice, no-fault has been offered as a response to the criticisms levele...
New Zealand’s accident compensation system is ‘no-fault’, meaning that New Zealanders are compensate...
Effective tort systems should enable access to compensation following medical injury. The existing A...
textabstractIn 1999 the Institute of Medicine reported that most medical injuries relate to unavoida...
No-fault compensation systems In a series of recent articles about no-fault compensation, CMAJ raise...
All around the world countries are trying to find a solution to deal with medical liability and pati...
Aims To discover the effect of the 2005 'no-fault' compensation reforms on medical professional acco...
As an alternative to the tort or fault-based system, a nofault compensation system has been viewed ...
The deficiencies of the tort system in handling medical negligence claims have been apparent for a n...
For decades in both Europe and the United states , the issue of compensation for victims f medical i...
An optimal compensation system should compensate injuries when they occur, but also reduce errors an...
A discussion of the work of the Scottish Government's No Fault Compensation Group.Medical practice, ...
This article highlights that medical malpractice litigation has been the focal point of the debate o...
The tort system is roundly indicted for its inadequacies in providing compensation in response to in...
The costs of litigation are large and increasing, to a level that places a drain on precious health-...
In the area of medical malpractice, no-fault has been offered as a response to the criticisms levele...
New Zealand’s accident compensation system is ‘no-fault’, meaning that New Zealanders are compensate...
Effective tort systems should enable access to compensation following medical injury. The existing A...
textabstractIn 1999 the Institute of Medicine reported that most medical injuries relate to unavoida...
No-fault compensation systems In a series of recent articles about no-fault compensation, CMAJ raise...
All around the world countries are trying to find a solution to deal with medical liability and pati...
Aims To discover the effect of the 2005 'no-fault' compensation reforms on medical professional acco...