In two studies examining resource allocation, support is found for the notion that group decisions are affected in systematic ways depending on whether or not there was individual consideration of the problem before meeting as a group. Specifically, compared to no prior consideration groups, prior consideration groups (1) escalate their commitment more in progress (i.e., ongoing) decisions, and (2) are less willing to concentrate resources on a single project in adoption (i.e., resource utilization) decisions. The findings challenge the blanket assertion that promoting divergent views in a group decision context is always related to better decisions
The escalation effect occurs when managers elect to commit additional resources to a project where t...
This article reports a simulation experiment which compared the decisions made by hierarchically org...
This article reports a simulation experiment which compared the decisions made by hierarchically org...
The present thesis examines differences in post-decision processes between members of groups and ind...
Group decision making has been praised as a panacea to overcome increasing task complexity, to solve...
This research studied the effects of a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) for face-to-face negotia...
Research indicates that when decision makers are faced with a second opportunity to invest in a proj...
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to test the influence of collaborative and consultative decis...
In this paper we wanted to offer such group decision making structure, which could improve the decis...
Problems facing modern society are unstructured and complex rendering traditional decision support w...
In this study, individuals and interacting 3-person groups were asked to make a series of allocation...
We revisit the phenomenon that group decisions differ systematically from decisions of individuals. ...
Triads, working under time pressure or not, participated in a management simulation that asked group...
The present thesis consists of three studies on the effects of group membership in large group decis...
We tested the ability of task conflict to improve the quality of decisions made by four-person group...
The escalation effect occurs when managers elect to commit additional resources to a project where t...
This article reports a simulation experiment which compared the decisions made by hierarchically org...
This article reports a simulation experiment which compared the decisions made by hierarchically org...
The present thesis examines differences in post-decision processes between members of groups and ind...
Group decision making has been praised as a panacea to overcome increasing task complexity, to solve...
This research studied the effects of a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) for face-to-face negotia...
Research indicates that when decision makers are faced with a second opportunity to invest in a proj...
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to test the influence of collaborative and consultative decis...
In this paper we wanted to offer such group decision making structure, which could improve the decis...
Problems facing modern society are unstructured and complex rendering traditional decision support w...
In this study, individuals and interacting 3-person groups were asked to make a series of allocation...
We revisit the phenomenon that group decisions differ systematically from decisions of individuals. ...
Triads, working under time pressure or not, participated in a management simulation that asked group...
The present thesis consists of three studies on the effects of group membership in large group decis...
We tested the ability of task conflict to improve the quality of decisions made by four-person group...
The escalation effect occurs when managers elect to commit additional resources to a project where t...
This article reports a simulation experiment which compared the decisions made by hierarchically org...
This article reports a simulation experiment which compared the decisions made by hierarchically org...