Add to ORKGThis paper presents the hybrid theory of stories and arguments for reasoning with evidence in legal cases and applies this theory to the Simonshaven case. In the hybrid theory, alternative hypothetical stories about “what happened” in a case are constructed and discussed in a dialectical process of argument and counterargument. After informally explaining stories, arguments, and the ways in which they interact, this paper gives a method for rational proof based on critical questions and shows how this method can be used in the Simonshaven case
In this article, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and ...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In this paper, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and bu...
This paper presents the hybrid theory of stories and arguments for reasoning with evidence in legal ...
Abstract In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evi...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evidential r...
The subject of this thesis is reasoning with evidence to establish the facts in criminal cases. In a...
We present a computational argumentation approach that models legal reasoning with evidence and proo...
In the process of proof alternative stories that explain 'what happened' in a case are tested using ...
In the literature on reasoning on the basis of evidence, two traditions exist: one argument-based, a...
In this article, we aim analyse whether a systematic method for reasoning with evidence in legal cas...
In this article, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and ...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In this paper, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and bu...
This paper presents the hybrid theory of stories and arguments for reasoning with evidence in legal ...
Abstract In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evi...
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a crimina...
In this paper, we continue our research on a hybrid narrative-argumentative approach to evidential r...
The subject of this thesis is reasoning with evidence to establish the facts in criminal cases. In a...
We present a computational argumentation approach that models legal reasoning with evidence and proo...
In the process of proof alternative stories that explain 'what happened' in a case are tested using ...
In the literature on reasoning on the basis of evidence, two traditions exist: one argument-based, a...
In this article, we aim analyse whether a systematic method for reasoning with evidence in legal cas...
In this article, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and ...
In the present paper, we provide a formalised version of a merged argumentative and story-based appr...
In this paper, we provide a formal logical model of evidential reasoning with proof standards and bu...