Using public-private interplay to climate-proof urban planning? : Critical lessons from developing a new housing district in Karlstad, Sweden

While strengthening public–private interplay is expected to improve the climate profile of urban planning in terms of mitigation and adaptation, less is known about the practice of such new interactive modes of governing. The paper critically examines the role, benefits and limitations of extended public–private interplay in developing a new housing district in Sweden. The developer dialogue between municipal officials and property developers confirms mutual interests, shared understandings and the added value of interacting. However, the closer the dialogue comes to settling agreements, the more difficult it gets for municipal officials to steer the process and its outcomes in favor of climate proofing. Complications with adapting to the new interactive setting means that municipal officials balance between acting as facilitators and/or regulators and property developers between acting as partners, competitors and/or defenders. Refining steering-strategies for sustaining commitments and securing formal agreements are pertinent for using public–private interplay to climate-proof urban planning.Funding agencies: Swedish Research Council Formas under Climate Change Policy Integration in Local Policy and Planning (CLIPP) [242-2011-1599]; Swedish Research Council Formas under Exploring Urban Climate Transitions in the Making (ExTra) [942-2015-106]