In the wake of June 4 : an analysis of the Chinese students' decision-making process to stay in Australia

This is a study of the Chinese students' efforts to gain the right and chance to stay on in Australia after the June 4 massacre event occurred in Beijing in 1989, when there were about 20,000 of them living in Australia. The specific focus of this study is the experiences of the students over a period of twelve months from 4 June 1989 to 27 June 1990, when the students were virtually allowed to stay permanently. This was a special onshore migration intake. Such an intake once had a significant impact upon Australian humanitarian and refugee immigration policies in the late 1980s and the early 1990s. This is a topic relevant to international and refugee migration and in need of empirical explication and theoretical conceptualisation. A comprehensive study of the decision-making experiences of both international and refugee migrants has many dimensions. To develop an adequate portrayal of the onshore asylum seekers' decision-making process, this study uses the multimethod approach. Information gained from in-depth interviews forms the main empirical basis of this study. The data collected through participant observations is woven in among documentary sources, and both provide context to the main interview-based data. In the course of the literature review, current thinking on identity, especially on strategic identity formation is found to be a most useful theoretical framework to guide this study. By utilising the identity formation framework, this study addresses five aspects of the Chinese students' efforts to form their onshore asylum seekers' identity and to meet the Australian government's migration criteria for gaining the right and chance to stay on in this country permanently. The main features of the onshore asylum seekers' efforts to shape their identity to suit government criteria can be summarised as follows. Firstly, as these asylum seekers are onshore, they necessarily have extensive involvement with the local agencies in dealing with their residence issue. This involvement offers asylum seekers various notions of what a 'refugee identity' is, and this in turn influences how they constitute themselves in this local context. Secondly, the efforts of the onshore asylum seekers are made away from home in a new place. As such, they make their decisions in a newly formed primary social group, instead of within a family which, in current studies, is the most commonly documented decision-making unit. Thus, their decision-making distinguishes itself from the family-based process in many ways. Further, as onshore asylum seekers are not recognised by nor rescued by refugee agencies, they have to provide solid evidence to prove that they fit in with refugee criteria and are qualified to stay. This expectation results in onshore asylum seekers participating in a very self-conscious and more strategic process of constructing a refugee identity. Furthermore, the onshore refugee identity is consolidated and expressed by interactions with the major local agencies. This influences these agencies in terms of the way in which the onshore asylum seeker issue is perceived and solved. In particular, the asylum seekers actively contacted and lobbied the government, the media and the migrant service organisations. Lastly, as a logical development of the onshore asylum seekers' efforts to stay, the seekers take highly organised political actions, which often comply with the main themes of the conflicts in international political ideology