Add to ORKGAs the final judgment in the celebrated Microsoft case ends, this piece very briefly assesses the impact of its remedy. When evaluated in terms of its most important goals, the remedy has proven to be a failure. Microsoft\u27s monopoly power in the PC operating systems market is now as great as it was when the case was brought in 1998 or the remedy was ordered in 2002. The article also very briefly discusses the implications of this remedy for Google and AT&T
On June 28, 2001, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that Microsoft has violated the antitrust laws repe...
Andrew Gavil and Harry First’s book on the Department of Justice’s litigation against Microsoft will...
YesThe Microsoft Case is a battle between Microsoft, the global software giant, and the European Com...
As the final judgment in the celebrated Microsoft case ends, this piece very briefly assesses the im...
U.S. v. Microsoft and the related state suit filed in 1998 appear to have concluded. In a unanimous ...
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
According to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft was a “predacious” monopolizer that did extens...
Most of the popular and scholarly discussions of Microsoft have focused on whether the defendant vio...
The en banc decision of the D.C. Circuit in Microsoft1 partially overturning Judge Thomas Penfield J...
News release offers a series of articles on the differing opinions of UD experts on the U.S. Appeals...
Thirty years ago, Microsoft Corp. was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen. To understand how the c...
This article briefly compares and contrasts the recent U.S. Federal Trade Commission\u27s antitrust ...
The Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft Corporation has generated considerable int...
Antitrust law enforcement is sometimes criticized for taking too long to obtain results. On the one ...
[Excerpt] Microsoft Corporation, the world’s largest software company, has been facing antitrust sc...
On June 28, 2001, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that Microsoft has violated the antitrust laws repe...
Andrew Gavil and Harry First’s book on the Department of Justice’s litigation against Microsoft will...
YesThe Microsoft Case is a battle between Microsoft, the global software giant, and the European Com...
As the final judgment in the celebrated Microsoft case ends, this piece very briefly assesses the im...
U.S. v. Microsoft and the related state suit filed in 1998 appear to have concluded. In a unanimous ...
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
According to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, Microsoft was a “predacious” monopolizer that did extens...
Most of the popular and scholarly discussions of Microsoft have focused on whether the defendant vio...
The en banc decision of the D.C. Circuit in Microsoft1 partially overturning Judge Thomas Penfield J...
News release offers a series of articles on the differing opinions of UD experts on the U.S. Appeals...
Thirty years ago, Microsoft Corp. was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen. To understand how the c...
This article briefly compares and contrasts the recent U.S. Federal Trade Commission\u27s antitrust ...
The Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft Corporation has generated considerable int...
Antitrust law enforcement is sometimes criticized for taking too long to obtain results. On the one ...
[Excerpt] Microsoft Corporation, the world’s largest software company, has been facing antitrust sc...
On June 28, 2001, the D.C. Court of Appeals held that Microsoft has violated the antitrust laws repe...
Andrew Gavil and Harry First’s book on the Department of Justice’s litigation against Microsoft will...
YesThe Microsoft Case is a battle between Microsoft, the global software giant, and the European Com...