This article analyzes the Canadian Superior Propane decision, apparently the first merger decision in world history to consider explicitly what to do when a merger was predicted to lead to both higher consumer prices and to net efficiencies. The article advocates analyzing the merger under a price to consumers or consumer welfare standard, rather than a total efficiency standard, and advocates that the enforcers and the courts block such mergers
This Article examines current judicial interpretation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act through the le...
U.S. antitrust law empowers enforcers to review pending mergers that might undermine competition. Bu...
This article traces the evolution of federal merger policy. It documents how merger enforcement orig...
This article analyzes the Canadian Superior Propane decision, apparently the first merger decision i...
This article demonstrates that significant net efficiencies from a merger could cause prices to decr...
This article looks first at the process courts use to resolve merger challenges and finds that in th...
This is one of the first articles to demonstrate that the primary goal of antitrust is neither exclu...
This Article examines economic efficiencies analysis in the merger review processes of Canada, the E...
Mergers of business firms violate the antitrust laws when they threaten to lessen competition, which...
Courts today permit private damages actions for illegal mergers under section 7 of the Clayton Act. ...
Whatever the statutory differences or language differences in Guidelines between Canada and the US t...
When should the government challenge a merger that might increase market power but also generate eff...
This article reviews every litigated federal merger case since 1992, when the federal enforcement ag...
This Essay provides an overview of U.S. antitrust merger practice in addressing efficiencies both in...
Federal antitrust enforcement has undergone a radical transformation in the past decade. The change ...
This Article examines current judicial interpretation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act through the le...
U.S. antitrust law empowers enforcers to review pending mergers that might undermine competition. Bu...
This article traces the evolution of federal merger policy. It documents how merger enforcement orig...
This article analyzes the Canadian Superior Propane decision, apparently the first merger decision i...
This article demonstrates that significant net efficiencies from a merger could cause prices to decr...
This article looks first at the process courts use to resolve merger challenges and finds that in th...
This is one of the first articles to demonstrate that the primary goal of antitrust is neither exclu...
This Article examines economic efficiencies analysis in the merger review processes of Canada, the E...
Mergers of business firms violate the antitrust laws when they threaten to lessen competition, which...
Courts today permit private damages actions for illegal mergers under section 7 of the Clayton Act. ...
Whatever the statutory differences or language differences in Guidelines between Canada and the US t...
When should the government challenge a merger that might increase market power but also generate eff...
This article reviews every litigated federal merger case since 1992, when the federal enforcement ag...
This Essay provides an overview of U.S. antitrust merger practice in addressing efficiencies both in...
Federal antitrust enforcement has undergone a radical transformation in the past decade. The change ...
This Article examines current judicial interpretation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act through the le...
U.S. antitrust law empowers enforcers to review pending mergers that might undermine competition. Bu...
This article traces the evolution of federal merger policy. It documents how merger enforcement orig...