Add to ORKGThis article traces the evolution of federal merger policy. It documents how merger enforcement originally was largely based upon very strong structural presumptions. These presumptions gradually eroded and other factors became more and more important in enforcement decisions. Today meger enforcement essentially consists of structural safe harbors and a full rule of reason analysis for any merger not within these safe harbors
The DOJ-FTC Merger Guidelines were developed for and best deal with horizontal mergers where the the...
This paper deals with the enforcement of merger policy, and aims to study how merger remedies affec...
The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is charged with the responsibility of challengin...
This article traces the evolution of federal merger policy. It documents how merger enforcement orig...
From its modern origins more than thirty years ago federal merger policy has centered around the use...
This Article makes two primary contributions to the antitrust literature. First, it identifies the d...
Does recent federal merger regulation make economic sense? Merger activity has clearly increased thi...
This article looks first at the process courts use to resolve merger challenges and finds that in th...
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate these new anti-merger instruments on the basis of economic ...
This paper examines the impact of the 1982 Department of Justice Merger Guidelines on the stock mark...
The challenge of effective merger enforcement is tremendous. U.S. antitrust agencies must, by statut...
New Horizontal Merger Guidelines were issued jointly by the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade...
This article addresses the application of the economic literature on merger simulation to the practi...
Since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1963 decision in Philadelphia National Bank, antitrust challenger...
With the growth of the administrative state, agency-promulgated enforcement policy statements, typic...
The DOJ-FTC Merger Guidelines were developed for and best deal with horizontal mergers where the the...
This paper deals with the enforcement of merger policy, and aims to study how merger remedies affec...
The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is charged with the responsibility of challengin...
This article traces the evolution of federal merger policy. It documents how merger enforcement orig...
From its modern origins more than thirty years ago federal merger policy has centered around the use...
This Article makes two primary contributions to the antitrust literature. First, it identifies the d...
Does recent federal merger regulation make economic sense? Merger activity has clearly increased thi...
This article looks first at the process courts use to resolve merger challenges and finds that in th...
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate these new anti-merger instruments on the basis of economic ...
This paper examines the impact of the 1982 Department of Justice Merger Guidelines on the stock mark...
The challenge of effective merger enforcement is tremendous. U.S. antitrust agencies must, by statut...
New Horizontal Merger Guidelines were issued jointly by the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade...
This article addresses the application of the economic literature on merger simulation to the practi...
Since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1963 decision in Philadelphia National Bank, antitrust challenger...
With the growth of the administrative state, agency-promulgated enforcement policy statements, typic...
The DOJ-FTC Merger Guidelines were developed for and best deal with horizontal mergers where the the...
This paper deals with the enforcement of merger policy, and aims to study how merger remedies affec...
The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is charged with the responsibility of challengin...