The authors consider the question of whether warranty law in Maryland now provides the plaintiff in a product liability case with a cause of action similar to that which would be available wider the doctrine of strict liability in tort. The development of the strict liability doctrine is traced and its current scope and requirements for recovery are compared with those of the action for breach of the implied warranty provided in the Uniform Commercial Code
An unusual type of products liability case raises the issue of whether an injured consumer can recov...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
Many manufacturers and insurance companies claim that a products liability crisis exists. This is ev...
The authors consider the question of whether warranty law in Maryland now provides the plaintiff in ...
The author discusses and compares the various theories of recovery available in a product liability ...
The authors discuss recent developments in Florida law in the area of products liability. The distin...
Since World War H, revolutionary changes have overtaken the American law of products liability. Such...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
The twenty years since the introduction of the concept of strict products Liability have been marked...
Product liability has evolved from a combination of contract and tort theories. Under current contra...
In recent years, product liability law in Maryland and across the country has placed greater respons...
The past decade has seen dramatic developments in the law of products liability. There has been libe...
This Article contends that “strict liability,” at least as the concept has been used in Massachusett...
Since the doctrine of caveat emptor gave way to a more enlightened response, the courts have struggl...
The assault upon the citadel, having proceeded apace for 35 years, has achieved spectacular victory....
An unusual type of products liability case raises the issue of whether an injured consumer can recov...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
Many manufacturers and insurance companies claim that a products liability crisis exists. This is ev...
The authors consider the question of whether warranty law in Maryland now provides the plaintiff in ...
The author discusses and compares the various theories of recovery available in a product liability ...
The authors discuss recent developments in Florida law in the area of products liability. The distin...
Since World War H, revolutionary changes have overtaken the American law of products liability. Such...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
The twenty years since the introduction of the concept of strict products Liability have been marked...
Product liability has evolved from a combination of contract and tort theories. Under current contra...
In recent years, product liability law in Maryland and across the country has placed greater respons...
The past decade has seen dramatic developments in the law of products liability. There has been libe...
This Article contends that “strict liability,” at least as the concept has been used in Massachusett...
Since the doctrine of caveat emptor gave way to a more enlightened response, the courts have struggl...
The assault upon the citadel, having proceeded apace for 35 years, has achieved spectacular victory....
An unusual type of products liability case raises the issue of whether an injured consumer can recov...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
Many manufacturers and insurance companies claim that a products liability crisis exists. This is ev...