The debate over which legal Indigenous Peoples should govern Native American political power and property rights, or even whether they should be protected by law at all, caused conflicts challenging the autonomy of the legal system and led to changes of the original principles of Indian rights. The outcome of that conflict raises two questions of federal Indian law. One is where its principles contributed to the survival of Native Americans in the United States; the other is whether the same legal principles are responsible for the perpetual inferiority of Natives Americans in their own land. More starkly, the question is whether the law ought to be praised or cursed for what it has done to the Indian
This paper is intended to encourage discussion and stimulate action and thought as well as to suppor...
This article is intended to rebut several of Mr. Brakel\u27s key assertions and to emphasize the wel...
American Indian tribal sovereignty is viewed very differently in the United States Supreme Court tha...
Like the miner\u27s canary, the Indian marks the shift from fresh air to poison gas in our political...
The law of Indian tribes is under attack by non-Indians, with the most strident and hostile attacks ...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
The law of Indian tribes is under attack by non-Indians, with the most strident and hostile attacks ...
This Article will demonstrate that virtually all elements of Indian affairs can be traced to the dec...
Over the past 500 years, American Indians have been subjected to inequalities through the United Sta...
Although the Court has in many instances ruled in favor of Native Americans, its approach in the mul...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
This exploration reveals that tribes were not as anomalous as the Supreme Court of the United States...
This study explores the legal history of the Indian civilizations of North America. It focuses on th...
American Indian law commonly describes the body of law by which the United States government regulat...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
This paper is intended to encourage discussion and stimulate action and thought as well as to suppor...
This article is intended to rebut several of Mr. Brakel\u27s key assertions and to emphasize the wel...
American Indian tribal sovereignty is viewed very differently in the United States Supreme Court tha...
Like the miner\u27s canary, the Indian marks the shift from fresh air to poison gas in our political...
The law of Indian tribes is under attack by non-Indians, with the most strident and hostile attacks ...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
The law of Indian tribes is under attack by non-Indians, with the most strident and hostile attacks ...
This Article will demonstrate that virtually all elements of Indian affairs can be traced to the dec...
Over the past 500 years, American Indians have been subjected to inequalities through the United Sta...
Although the Court has in many instances ruled in favor of Native Americans, its approach in the mul...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
This exploration reveals that tribes were not as anomalous as the Supreme Court of the United States...
This study explores the legal history of the Indian civilizations of North America. It focuses on th...
American Indian law commonly describes the body of law by which the United States government regulat...
Since 1831, Indian nations have been viewed as Domestic Dependent Nations located within the geograp...
This paper is intended to encourage discussion and stimulate action and thought as well as to suppor...
This article is intended to rebut several of Mr. Brakel\u27s key assertions and to emphasize the wel...
American Indian tribal sovereignty is viewed very differently in the United States Supreme Court tha...