The purpose of this article is to suggest a viable, necessary, and eminently reasonable legislative alternative that the Virginia General Assembly should enact for legitimate and pressing public policy reasons in order to properly protect Virginia consumers from defective and unreasonably dangerous consumer products.Adopting this alternative would bring the Commonwealth of Virginia into the mainstream of twenty-first century American, and transnational, products liability law
In the evolution of products liability law, therefore,should be the time for doing what usually come...
The Model Uniform Product Liability Act was proposed to ensure the availability of product liability...
This article draws out the products liability debate and the push for settlements over litigation in...
The purpose of this article is to suggest a viable, necessary, and eminently reasonable legislative ...
The purpose of this Article is fourfold: first, to illustrate that there is currently a newer, more ...
Virginia remains one of five states that refuse to adopt strict products liability. To date, the Sup...
Over the past three decades, literally thousands of American products liability judicial opinions ha...
When the history of Twentieth Century America\u27s jurisprudence is chronicled, a prominent chapter ...
While Virginia is not typically seen as progressive in the field of product liability law, the Com...
Professor Wertheimer has proposed that courts be allowed to hold producers strictly liable for produ...
Since World War H, revolutionary changes have overtaken the American law of products liability. Such...
In this article I have tried to offer a rational, feasible, and politically acceptable solution to t...
Despite the failure of the 104th Congress to override President Clinton\u27s veto and enact the Comm...
We are now all well-accustomed to rapid change. Alvin Toffler writes in his book, aptly titled Futur...
This note will deal with the effects of proposed Senate Bill No. 67 on product liability law as it i...
In the evolution of products liability law, therefore,should be the time for doing what usually come...
The Model Uniform Product Liability Act was proposed to ensure the availability of product liability...
This article draws out the products liability debate and the push for settlements over litigation in...
The purpose of this article is to suggest a viable, necessary, and eminently reasonable legislative ...
The purpose of this Article is fourfold: first, to illustrate that there is currently a newer, more ...
Virginia remains one of five states that refuse to adopt strict products liability. To date, the Sup...
Over the past three decades, literally thousands of American products liability judicial opinions ha...
When the history of Twentieth Century America\u27s jurisprudence is chronicled, a prominent chapter ...
While Virginia is not typically seen as progressive in the field of product liability law, the Com...
Professor Wertheimer has proposed that courts be allowed to hold producers strictly liable for produ...
Since World War H, revolutionary changes have overtaken the American law of products liability. Such...
In this article I have tried to offer a rational, feasible, and politically acceptable solution to t...
Despite the failure of the 104th Congress to override President Clinton\u27s veto and enact the Comm...
We are now all well-accustomed to rapid change. Alvin Toffler writes in his book, aptly titled Futur...
This note will deal with the effects of proposed Senate Bill No. 67 on product liability law as it i...
In the evolution of products liability law, therefore,should be the time for doing what usually come...
The Model Uniform Product Liability Act was proposed to ensure the availability of product liability...
This article draws out the products liability debate and the push for settlements over litigation in...