Traditionally, the theft loss deduction for Federal income tax was limited in several ways. The limitations included requiring that the theft be considered a theft under the state law in which the theft occurred and that there be direct privity between the person committing the theft and the person against whom the theft occurred. The restrictions have made it hard to use the theft loss deduction in most securities fraud cases. This Article examines the history of the theft loss deduction and recent changes that may show a relaxing of some of these restrictions, and how these changes may impact allowing for the theft loss deduction in securities fraud cases
Accounting scandals such as Waste Management and Hertz Global Holding\u27s shatter investor confiden...
After decades of confusion, in 1991 the Supreme Court articulated a uniform federal limitations peri...
Created pursuant to section 10 of the 1934 Securities Act, Rule 10b-5 is a cornerstone of the federa...
Traditionally, the theft loss deduction for Federal income tax was limited in several ways. The limi...
There is a long history of cases interpreting whether a theft loss deduction for securities fraud is...
(Excerpt) This Article focuses on some of these problems in the field of federal income tax. It sugg...
May courts legitimately impose their public policy views to override statutory commands? This articl...
The global financial crisis precipitated a condensing of capital and a fall in global equities marke...
The taxation of thieves and their victims must be studied as a whole. Both perpetrators and victims ...
Since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, l there has been ...
No coherent doctrinal statement exists for calculating open-market damages for securities fraud cl...
Ponzi schemes have received much attention lately. In the Madoff scandal alone, investors have lost ...
The securities regulation landscape has changed dramatically in recent years. Federal laws have incr...
State law gives corporate managers extremely broad power to direct increasingly large pools of colle...
Abstract This article explores the economic principles and theories underlying loss causation in th...
Accounting scandals such as Waste Management and Hertz Global Holding\u27s shatter investor confiden...
After decades of confusion, in 1991 the Supreme Court articulated a uniform federal limitations peri...
Created pursuant to section 10 of the 1934 Securities Act, Rule 10b-5 is a cornerstone of the federa...
Traditionally, the theft loss deduction for Federal income tax was limited in several ways. The limi...
There is a long history of cases interpreting whether a theft loss deduction for securities fraud is...
(Excerpt) This Article focuses on some of these problems in the field of federal income tax. It sugg...
May courts legitimately impose their public policy views to override statutory commands? This articl...
The global financial crisis precipitated a condensing of capital and a fall in global equities marke...
The taxation of thieves and their victims must be studied as a whole. Both perpetrators and victims ...
Since the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, l there has been ...
No coherent doctrinal statement exists for calculating open-market damages for securities fraud cl...
Ponzi schemes have received much attention lately. In the Madoff scandal alone, investors have lost ...
The securities regulation landscape has changed dramatically in recent years. Federal laws have incr...
State law gives corporate managers extremely broad power to direct increasingly large pools of colle...
Abstract This article explores the economic principles and theories underlying loss causation in th...
Accounting scandals such as Waste Management and Hertz Global Holding\u27s shatter investor confiden...
After decades of confusion, in 1991 the Supreme Court articulated a uniform federal limitations peri...
Created pursuant to section 10 of the 1934 Securities Act, Rule 10b-5 is a cornerstone of the federa...