This Article will examine the history of the statutory right of appeal based upon a substantial constitutional question; highlight the interpretation and application of this provision, particularly over the past five years; provide a look at a few of the cases in which the North Carolina Supreme Court has accepted the notice of appeal ( NOA ) based upon a substantial constitutional question or instead has dismissed and not retained; and propose an appropriate test for applying this provision and potential statutory amendments that will better define and more uniformly address the question of what constitutes a substantial constitutional question
The purpose of this article is to contribute data for the purposes of debates on how effectively the...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
Under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, federal criminal defendants who wish to remain free on bail after...
This Article will examine the history of the statutory right of appeal based upon a substantial cons...
One does not have the right to appeal from an interlocutory order except in certain circumstances. I...
Accordingly, this Comment will analyze the constitutionality of North Carolina\u27s prejudgment stat...
The jurisdiction of the New York Court of Appeals has long been shrouded in mystery. When the Court ...
This article seeks to clear up the confusion over substantial federal questions. Part I provides a...
The purpose of this article is to contribute data for the purposes of debates on how effectively the...
This Comment explores the history of Rule 2 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the ...
This 1981 article discusses principles of federal constitutional law. Professor Baker notes that the...
The purpose of this article is to contribute data for the purposes of debates on how effectively the...
It is time for the Supreme Court to explicitly recognize a constitutional right to appeal. Over the ...
The many consequences of constitutionalizing the right to appeal become evident only when one answ...
This Article explores the development of the political question doctrine in North Carolina jurisprud...
The purpose of this article is to contribute data for the purposes of debates on how effectively the...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
Under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, federal criminal defendants who wish to remain free on bail after...
This Article will examine the history of the statutory right of appeal based upon a substantial cons...
One does not have the right to appeal from an interlocutory order except in certain circumstances. I...
Accordingly, this Comment will analyze the constitutionality of North Carolina\u27s prejudgment stat...
The jurisdiction of the New York Court of Appeals has long been shrouded in mystery. When the Court ...
This article seeks to clear up the confusion over substantial federal questions. Part I provides a...
The purpose of this article is to contribute data for the purposes of debates on how effectively the...
This Comment explores the history of Rule 2 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the ...
This 1981 article discusses principles of federal constitutional law. Professor Baker notes that the...
The purpose of this article is to contribute data for the purposes of debates on how effectively the...
It is time for the Supreme Court to explicitly recognize a constitutional right to appeal. Over the ...
The many consequences of constitutionalizing the right to appeal become evident only when one answ...
This Article explores the development of the political question doctrine in North Carolina jurisprud...
The purpose of this article is to contribute data for the purposes of debates on how effectively the...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
Under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, federal criminal defendants who wish to remain free on bail after...