Add to ORKGThe purpose of this article is to explore the substantive provisions of amended Rule 11 and its historic antecedents, the procedure by which sanctions may be sought and/or imposed, the sanctions which the court may impose and the persons upon whom the sanctions can be imposed
In a unanimous en banc ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Townsend v. Holman Consulting ...
Admittedly, amended Rule 11 has stirred up a great deal of controversy. The Advisory Committee of wh...
Prior to the 1983 amendments to Rule 11, there was some concern as to whether or not the Federal Rul...
This article examines the Townsend decision and its interpretation and application of Rule 11 sancti...
This article will argue that the standard for imposing sanctions under Rule 11 should focus on the n...
The purpose of this article is to explore the substantive provisions of amended Rule 11 and its hist...
The 1983 revision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 11 or the Rule ) prove...
The 1983 amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure arose from concern over the flood of litigation ...
With only a small risk of overstatement, one could say that sanctions in civil litigation exploded d...
Since its amendment in 1983, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has become the focus of...
The 1983 amendments to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 11, concerning sanctions for frivolous litigatio...
Prompted by their perception that significant civil litigation misconduct involving frivolous papers...
Congress reformed the procedures for amending the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1988 by prescr...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires courts to sanction attorneys who file frivolous papers. ...
The House of Representatives has passed H.R. 720, a bill that would amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rul...
In a unanimous en banc ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Townsend v. Holman Consulting ...
Admittedly, amended Rule 11 has stirred up a great deal of controversy. The Advisory Committee of wh...
Prior to the 1983 amendments to Rule 11, there was some concern as to whether or not the Federal Rul...
This article examines the Townsend decision and its interpretation and application of Rule 11 sancti...
This article will argue that the standard for imposing sanctions under Rule 11 should focus on the n...
The purpose of this article is to explore the substantive provisions of amended Rule 11 and its hist...
The 1983 revision of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 11 or the Rule ) prove...
The 1983 amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure arose from concern over the flood of litigation ...
With only a small risk of overstatement, one could say that sanctions in civil litigation exploded d...
Since its amendment in 1983, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has become the focus of...
The 1983 amendments to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 11, concerning sanctions for frivolous litigatio...
Prompted by their perception that significant civil litigation misconduct involving frivolous papers...
Congress reformed the procedures for amending the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1988 by prescr...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires courts to sanction attorneys who file frivolous papers. ...
The House of Representatives has passed H.R. 720, a bill that would amend Rule 11 of the Federal Rul...
In a unanimous en banc ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Townsend v. Holman Consulting ...
Admittedly, amended Rule 11 has stirred up a great deal of controversy. The Advisory Committee of wh...
Prior to the 1983 amendments to Rule 11, there was some concern as to whether or not the Federal Rul...