This Note has five purposes. First, this Note reviews the facts of Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. Second, this Note examines the judicial logic of the Brown decision. Third, this Note addresses public policy concerns left unanswered by the courts. Fourth, this Note examines Brown\u27s impact on N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(4). Finally, this Note concludes that while Brown should be applauded for extending the duty to defend, the court unnecessarily stretched basic principles of contract law to justify its decision
Plaintiff\u27s truck was hit by a tree felled by a logging contractor\u27s employee. The truck was i...
I. Introduction II. The Decision … A. Facts … B. Holding III. Analysis … A. Nuisance as an Occurrenc...
This Note examines the liability of landowners to police officers who enter upon the land in the exe...
For years the conflict of interest problem that occasionally arose out of the defense of an insured ...
In pursuit of a greater understanding of this controversial subject, this article will: (1) explore ...
This Note explores the consequences of an insurer’s breach of the duty to defend under Missouri case...
Possibly the most important decision in the insurance field in 1968 involved not the rights and obli...
When a liability insurer defends claims brought against its insured, its interests frequently come i...
An insurer\u27s duty to defend in connection with liability insurance policies is well-established a...
This article examines the right of a liability insurer to control the defense of its insured, the du...
In Tidyman’s Management Services, Inc. v. Davis, (Tidyman’s) the Montana Supreme Court neglected to ...
The author analyzes the insurer\u27s duty to defend and the judicial dilemma in choosing between the...
This Note analyzes the Coleman case. The Note suggests that the court incorrectly applied the public...
In a previous paper, I suggested that the Missouri Supreme Court had adopted a forfeiture penalty fo...
In liability insurance, the duty to defend is broader than the duty to cover. Thus it is possible th...
Plaintiff\u27s truck was hit by a tree felled by a logging contractor\u27s employee. The truck was i...
I. Introduction II. The Decision … A. Facts … B. Holding III. Analysis … A. Nuisance as an Occurrenc...
This Note examines the liability of landowners to police officers who enter upon the land in the exe...
For years the conflict of interest problem that occasionally arose out of the defense of an insured ...
In pursuit of a greater understanding of this controversial subject, this article will: (1) explore ...
This Note explores the consequences of an insurer’s breach of the duty to defend under Missouri case...
Possibly the most important decision in the insurance field in 1968 involved not the rights and obli...
When a liability insurer defends claims brought against its insured, its interests frequently come i...
An insurer\u27s duty to defend in connection with liability insurance policies is well-established a...
This article examines the right of a liability insurer to control the defense of its insured, the du...
In Tidyman’s Management Services, Inc. v. Davis, (Tidyman’s) the Montana Supreme Court neglected to ...
The author analyzes the insurer\u27s duty to defend and the judicial dilemma in choosing between the...
This Note analyzes the Coleman case. The Note suggests that the court incorrectly applied the public...
In a previous paper, I suggested that the Missouri Supreme Court had adopted a forfeiture penalty fo...
In liability insurance, the duty to defend is broader than the duty to cover. Thus it is possible th...
Plaintiff\u27s truck was hit by a tree felled by a logging contractor\u27s employee. The truck was i...
I. Introduction II. The Decision … A. Facts … B. Holding III. Analysis … A. Nuisance as an Occurrenc...
This Note examines the liability of landowners to police officers who enter upon the land in the exe...