Add to ORKGThis note will analyze primarily the United States v. Jannotti phase of the overall ABSCAM operation, because of its particular facts and its extensive discussion of both the entrapment defense and its interrelated due process claim
This Article discusses the relatively spare and unsettled case law relating to the staged arrest, re...
It is fundamental, even in a federal system, that a state be free to regulate the procedure of its c...
Since 1932, the defense of entrapment has been firmly established in the federal courts; however, th...
Part I of this Article surveys the development of the competing threads of entrapment theory. Part I...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the defense of entrapment is available only if ...
Certain types of criminal activity are consensual and covert. Hence they are virtually undetectable ...
The federal law of procedure in entrapment cases is in profound disarray. Despite four attempts over...
The issue of entrapment arises initially as a defense when a person is accused of committing a crimi...
In Jacobson v. United States, the Supreme Court narrowed the types of evidence that the prosecution ...
The task of this Article is to assess the competing approaches that circuit courts have taken in def...
The ever increasing rise in so-called victimless crimes has been accompanied by a corresponding incr...
In Hampton v. United States the Supreme Court held that the defense of entrapment is not available t...
This article contrasts the different approaches to dealing with entrapment: the due process rubric o...
Paul Marcus has produced an extremely thorough article on the intriguing and complex defense of entr...
The entrapment defense has been used to provide a check on government investigation of criminal acti...
This Article discusses the relatively spare and unsettled case law relating to the staged arrest, re...
It is fundamental, even in a federal system, that a state be free to regulate the procedure of its c...
Since 1932, the defense of entrapment has been firmly established in the federal courts; however, th...
Part I of this Article surveys the development of the competing threads of entrapment theory. Part I...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the defense of entrapment is available only if ...
Certain types of criminal activity are consensual and covert. Hence they are virtually undetectable ...
The federal law of procedure in entrapment cases is in profound disarray. Despite four attempts over...
The issue of entrapment arises initially as a defense when a person is accused of committing a crimi...
In Jacobson v. United States, the Supreme Court narrowed the types of evidence that the prosecution ...
The task of this Article is to assess the competing approaches that circuit courts have taken in def...
The ever increasing rise in so-called victimless crimes has been accompanied by a corresponding incr...
In Hampton v. United States the Supreme Court held that the defense of entrapment is not available t...
This article contrasts the different approaches to dealing with entrapment: the due process rubric o...
Paul Marcus has produced an extremely thorough article on the intriguing and complex defense of entr...
The entrapment defense has been used to provide a check on government investigation of criminal acti...
This Article discusses the relatively spare and unsettled case law relating to the staged arrest, re...
It is fundamental, even in a federal system, that a state be free to regulate the procedure of its c...
Since 1932, the defense of entrapment has been firmly established in the federal courts; however, th...