Add to ORKGThe purpose of this Note is to examine the fourth amendment implications of the holding in Villamonte-Marquez. The Note will examine the Court\u27s treatment of Section 1581(a) under which the search arose, analyze the judicial treatment of the decisions relied on by the Court and criticize the Court\u27s treatment of the reasonableness of the governmental intrusion. The Note concludes that because private cabin-boaters have great interests against arbitrary intrusion by officials, cases such as Villamonte-Marquez should be scrutinized more carefully to preserve the protection of the fourth amendment
The Florida v. Bostick decision raises important Fourth Amendment questions regarding police encount...
The Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA), enacted through Congress’s power to “define...
When the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decided the case of United States v. Mosquera...
The purpose of this Note is to examine the fourth amendment implications of the holding in Villamont...
Today no statute prohibits the mere possession of marijuana or other controlled substances beyond th...
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has taken the instant opportunity to write an essay on the law of...
This article presents the development of the law of searches at sea. The statutes authorizing these ...
The purpose of this article is to review the decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the...
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently attempted to harmonize the discordant precedent that ha...
This Comment examines recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court which indicate the Court i...
This Note examines federal circuit law in the area of covert warrants. Specifically it discusses a S...
This Note analyzes LaDuke v. Nelson, in which the Ninth Circuit held that the farm and ranch check p...
The war on drugs and the effort to contain international terrorism have raised questions of when t...
The Administration\u27s recent policy of Say No to Drugs has sparked a veritable war on drugs with...
In Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that state remedies were still a...
The Florida v. Bostick decision raises important Fourth Amendment questions regarding police encount...
The Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA), enacted through Congress’s power to “define...
When the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decided the case of United States v. Mosquera...
The purpose of this Note is to examine the fourth amendment implications of the holding in Villamont...
Today no statute prohibits the mere possession of marijuana or other controlled substances beyond th...
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has taken the instant opportunity to write an essay on the law of...
This article presents the development of the law of searches at sea. The statutes authorizing these ...
The purpose of this article is to review the decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the...
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently attempted to harmonize the discordant precedent that ha...
This Comment examines recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court which indicate the Court i...
This Note examines federal circuit law in the area of covert warrants. Specifically it discusses a S...
This Note analyzes LaDuke v. Nelson, in which the Ninth Circuit held that the farm and ranch check p...
The war on drugs and the effort to contain international terrorism have raised questions of when t...
The Administration\u27s recent policy of Say No to Drugs has sparked a veritable war on drugs with...
In Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that state remedies were still a...
The Florida v. Bostick decision raises important Fourth Amendment questions regarding police encount...
The Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA), enacted through Congress’s power to “define...
When the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decided the case of United States v. Mosquera...