Add to ORKGThe Civil Rights Act of 1991 (the Act) made significant changes to the major employment discrimination statutes. In addition to restoring the law that was in effect prior to a number of Supreme Court decisions which eroded the civil rights statutes, the Act also added remedies that were omitted from previous legislation. One important area that was unclear at the time of the Act\u27s passage was the issue of retroactivity. In light of the Act\u27s unclear legislative history, ambiguous statutory language, and seemingly contradictory Supreme Court precedent, the Act\u27s retroactive nature has been widely litigated and discussed
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has recently celebrated its fifth anniversary. While it is...
The United States Supreme Court promulgated the 1983 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Proced...
This Note addresses the applicability of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to cases pending on the Act\u2...
This Comment discusses how and when federal civil laws are applied retroactively, the proper mode of...
On November 21, 1991, President Bush signed the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (the Act ) into law. The A...
I. Introduction II. General Overview III. Section-by-Section Analysis ... A. Title I ... B. Title II...
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Conn. 1975). As the federal judiciary continu...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1991 primarily to modify numerous Supreme Court opinions of ...
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT in McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.\u27 held that Title...
Two civil rights cases, of particular significance as we commemorate the fortieth anniversary of the...
During the period covered by this survey, most of the constitutional law and civil rights cases cons...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s landmark decision in Runyon v. McCrary interpreted section one ...
This Note analyzes the controversy and concludes that courts must apply an impact standard in title ...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has recently celebrated its fifth anniversary. While it is...
The United States Supreme Court promulgated the 1983 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Proced...
This Note addresses the applicability of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to cases pending on the Act\u2...
This Comment discusses how and when federal civil laws are applied retroactively, the proper mode of...
On November 21, 1991, President Bush signed the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (the Act ) into law. The A...
I. Introduction II. General Overview III. Section-by-Section Analysis ... A. Title I ... B. Title II...
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Conn. 1975). As the federal judiciary continu...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1991 primarily to modify numerous Supreme Court opinions of ...
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT in McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.\u27 held that Title...
Two civil rights cases, of particular significance as we commemorate the fortieth anniversary of the...
During the period covered by this survey, most of the constitutional law and civil rights cases cons...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s landmark decision in Runyon v. McCrary interpreted section one ...
This Note analyzes the controversy and concludes that courts must apply an impact standard in title ...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has recently celebrated its fifth anniversary. While it is...
The United States Supreme Court promulgated the 1983 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Proced...