Since 1971, Establishment Clause cases have been analyzed under the three-prong test articulated by the Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman. However, this test has often been criticized for producing inconsistent results. In addition, inconsistent application of the test by the Court, and conflicting philosophies among judges and scholars regarding the separation of church and state, have resulted in considerable objection to the Lemon test. In fact, at least five of the current Supreme Court Justices have expressed their dissatisfaction with the Lemon test as a workable framework for Establishment Clause analysis
Since 1947 the Establishment Clause\u27 has been a substantive check on governmental activity at all...
Since 1947 the Establishment Clause\u27 has been a substantive check on governmental activity at all...
This article provides an overview of the Lemon test, Miller test, and the Central Hudson test, asses...
After the decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman, one three-pronged test controlled all Establishment Clause ...
This paper argues that the Lemon test is a clear and pragmatic method for ensuring that Justices of ...
The separation of church and state, as contemplated by the First Amendment, has given rise to a trou...
This Recent Development argues that the Court\u27s apparent trend toward basing establishment clause...
This essay addresses the Supreme Court\u27s three-part establishment clause test originally set down...
The issue of religion and its place in society has been a topic of controversy and debate since long...
The Supreme Court of the United States has officially overturned Lemon v. Kurtzman. The controversia...
The Supreme Court of the United States has officially overturned Lemon v. Kurtzman. The controversia...
Supreme Court decisions based on the establishment clause in the U.S. Constitution have often drawn ...
This article responds to an article by Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, entitled Lemon Is Dead, i...
In 1980, the Supreme Court in Stone v. Graham addressed the issue of whether a statute requiring the...
This article provides an overview of the Lemon test, Miller test, and the Central Hudson test, asses...
Since 1947 the Establishment Clause\u27 has been a substantive check on governmental activity at all...
Since 1947 the Establishment Clause\u27 has been a substantive check on governmental activity at all...
This article provides an overview of the Lemon test, Miller test, and the Central Hudson test, asses...
After the decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman, one three-pronged test controlled all Establishment Clause ...
This paper argues that the Lemon test is a clear and pragmatic method for ensuring that Justices of ...
The separation of church and state, as contemplated by the First Amendment, has given rise to a trou...
This Recent Development argues that the Court\u27s apparent trend toward basing establishment clause...
This essay addresses the Supreme Court\u27s three-part establishment clause test originally set down...
The issue of religion and its place in society has been a topic of controversy and debate since long...
The Supreme Court of the United States has officially overturned Lemon v. Kurtzman. The controversia...
The Supreme Court of the United States has officially overturned Lemon v. Kurtzman. The controversia...
Supreme Court decisions based on the establishment clause in the U.S. Constitution have often drawn ...
This article responds to an article by Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, entitled Lemon Is Dead, i...
In 1980, the Supreme Court in Stone v. Graham addressed the issue of whether a statute requiring the...
This article provides an overview of the Lemon test, Miller test, and the Central Hudson test, asses...
Since 1947 the Establishment Clause\u27 has been a substantive check on governmental activity at all...
Since 1947 the Establishment Clause\u27 has been a substantive check on governmental activity at all...
This article provides an overview of the Lemon test, Miller test, and the Central Hudson test, asses...