In 1987, Virginia\u27s General Assembly enacted the Virginia Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Act (the Act). Although there is a dearth of official legislative history for the Act, newspaper reports provide some insight as to the intended purpose and scope. Reportedly, the Act was a response to medical malpractice insurers\u27 refusal to provide coverage for obstetricians. Proponents of the Act feared critical shortages of obstetrical services if action was not taken to ensure the availability of liability insurance
As a general rule, a plaintiff in actions for personal injury and wrongful death in Virginia, regard...
The dramatic rise in the incidence of malpractice claims over the past thirty years has revealed sev...
Parents suing for the wrongful birth of healthy babies have recovered diverse damage awards in the c...
Supreme Court of Virginiahttps://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/va-supreme-court-records-vol242/1048/t...
Since its enactment, Virginia\u27s statute limiting medical malpractice awards has spawned questions...
Consider the following scenario. A plaintiff is injured in a devastating automobile accident and a j...
Health care reform took center stage on a national level overthe past year. Despite suggestions that...
Chapter 611, 1976 Acts of Assembly, provided for sweeping changes in the laws of medical and hospita...
In Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring (Richmond Medical Center V), the United States Court...
In its 1989 session, the General Assembly amended several medical malpractice statutes. Perhaps the ...
Over the past year, medical malpractice and health care law in the Commonwealth have undergone signi...
The last major revision of Virginia statutes relating to medical malpractice was in 1976. At that ti...
Lawsuits for medical malpractice are supposed to serve two purposes: compensation of injured patient...
This Comment seeks to critique the Falls Church Medical Center’s holding that Virginia’s first-trime...
Part I of this Comment will provide an overview of the national perspective on these three types of ...
As a general rule, a plaintiff in actions for personal injury and wrongful death in Virginia, regard...
The dramatic rise in the incidence of malpractice claims over the past thirty years has revealed sev...
Parents suing for the wrongful birth of healthy babies have recovered diverse damage awards in the c...
Supreme Court of Virginiahttps://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/va-supreme-court-records-vol242/1048/t...
Since its enactment, Virginia\u27s statute limiting medical malpractice awards has spawned questions...
Consider the following scenario. A plaintiff is injured in a devastating automobile accident and a j...
Health care reform took center stage on a national level overthe past year. Despite suggestions that...
Chapter 611, 1976 Acts of Assembly, provided for sweeping changes in the laws of medical and hospita...
In Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring (Richmond Medical Center V), the United States Court...
In its 1989 session, the General Assembly amended several medical malpractice statutes. Perhaps the ...
Over the past year, medical malpractice and health care law in the Commonwealth have undergone signi...
The last major revision of Virginia statutes relating to medical malpractice was in 1976. At that ti...
Lawsuits for medical malpractice are supposed to serve two purposes: compensation of injured patient...
This Comment seeks to critique the Falls Church Medical Center’s holding that Virginia’s first-trime...
Part I of this Comment will provide an overview of the national perspective on these three types of ...
As a general rule, a plaintiff in actions for personal injury and wrongful death in Virginia, regard...
The dramatic rise in the incidence of malpractice claims over the past thirty years has revealed sev...
Parents suing for the wrongful birth of healthy babies have recovered diverse damage awards in the c...