Since 1899, the year in which the state of Illinois established a separate statutory framework for addressing the problems of children before the courts, the juvenile justice system has been struggling to establish its identity in the jurisprudence of the United States. The juvenile court laws of this country, including those of the Commonwealth of Virginia, have historically been based on the doctrine of parens patriae , which is formally defined as the sovereign power of guardianship over persons under disability. \u27 According to this doctrine, the state, through the court system, can be trusted to fulfill its obligation with respect to children with care and solicitude and without any insistence upon a granting of constitutional righ...
Since the United States Supreme Court\u27s decision in In re Gault in 1967, in which due process rig...
ANY DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIC ASPECTS of juvenile law necessarily requires that at least a brief inquir...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
The juvenile court, representing the parens patriae power of the state, was created in order to remo...
The Juvenile Court system was conceived and established at the turn of the century, although belated...
The waiver provisions produce a conflict between the ideal of the juvenile court that the best inte...
In the late nineteenth century, the juvenile court system was established in this country to deal wi...
The Virginia General Assembly once again acted in a very restrained fashion in addressing juvenile j...
juvenile court systems across the United States, the philosophy of juvenile justice has reflected so...
In an article in the October, 1966, issue of the American Bar Association Journal, Honorable Robert ...
Review of the 1969 decisions in juvenile law reveals that the courts in California, as elsewhere, ha...
Progressive reformers envisioned a therapeutic juvenile court that made individualized treatment dec...
The present method of treatment of neglected and delinquent children by the juvenile court in Missou...
The original purpose of the juvenile court was to create a forum, separate from the adult courts, in...
Since the United States Supreme Court\u27s decision in In re Gault in 1967, in which due process rig...
ANY DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIC ASPECTS of juvenile law necessarily requires that at least a brief inquir...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...
On June 20, 1966, the United States Supreme Court noted that it had probable jurisdiction in the cas...
The juvenile court, representing the parens patriae power of the state, was created in order to remo...
The Juvenile Court system was conceived and established at the turn of the century, although belated...
The waiver provisions produce a conflict between the ideal of the juvenile court that the best inte...
In the late nineteenth century, the juvenile court system was established in this country to deal wi...
The Virginia General Assembly once again acted in a very restrained fashion in addressing juvenile j...
juvenile court systems across the United States, the philosophy of juvenile justice has reflected so...
In an article in the October, 1966, issue of the American Bar Association Journal, Honorable Robert ...
Review of the 1969 decisions in juvenile law reveals that the courts in California, as elsewhere, ha...
Progressive reformers envisioned a therapeutic juvenile court that made individualized treatment dec...
The present method of treatment of neglected and delinquent children by the juvenile court in Missou...
The original purpose of the juvenile court was to create a forum, separate from the adult courts, in...
Since the United States Supreme Court\u27s decision in In re Gault in 1967, in which due process rig...
ANY DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIC ASPECTS of juvenile law necessarily requires that at least a brief inquir...
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proc...