Parental immunity prohibits a child from instituting a suit against his parent for a personal tort. However, when a child has sustained injury as a result of his parent\u27s tortious act committed in the course of his employment, and the child seeks recovery against his parent\u27s employer under the doctrine of respondeat superior, the majority of jurisdictions feel that this immunity is purely personal and should not be extended to the employer
In light of the abrupt change in Ohio concerning the parental immunity doctrine, this comment will e...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...
An action between a parent and his minor child was not prohibited at common law. In fact, the child ...
Although there is no case authority, it is probable that at common law there was no prohibition agai...
If the overriding purpose of tort law is to compensate those injured by the wrongdoing of another, t...
This note outlines the origins of the doctrine of parentalftort immunity and its development in Wash...
However repugnant it may seem that a minor child should sue his own father, it is equally repugnant ...
This note outlines the origins of the doctrine of parentalftort immunity and its development in Wash...
New Hampshire has now joined the trend toward the abolition of the parental immunity doctrine. Dean ...
Torts-PARENTAL IMMUNITY-THE FIRST DISTRICT DECLINES TO ADOPT THE DOCTRINE OF PARENTAL IMMUNIT
Torts-PARENTAL IMMUNITY-THE FIRST DISTRICT DECLINES TO ADOPT THE DOCTRINE OF PARENTAL IMMUNIT
Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St. 3d 326, 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984); Shearer v. Shearer, 18 Ohio St. 3d 9...
Child neglect and abandonment are serious problems in the United States. The number of children in f...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...
In light of the abrupt change in Ohio concerning the parental immunity doctrine, this comment will e...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...
An action between a parent and his minor child was not prohibited at common law. In fact, the child ...
Although there is no case authority, it is probable that at common law there was no prohibition agai...
If the overriding purpose of tort law is to compensate those injured by the wrongdoing of another, t...
This note outlines the origins of the doctrine of parentalftort immunity and its development in Wash...
However repugnant it may seem that a minor child should sue his own father, it is equally repugnant ...
This note outlines the origins of the doctrine of parentalftort immunity and its development in Wash...
New Hampshire has now joined the trend toward the abolition of the parental immunity doctrine. Dean ...
Torts-PARENTAL IMMUNITY-THE FIRST DISTRICT DECLINES TO ADOPT THE DOCTRINE OF PARENTAL IMMUNIT
Torts-PARENTAL IMMUNITY-THE FIRST DISTRICT DECLINES TO ADOPT THE DOCTRINE OF PARENTAL IMMUNIT
Kirchner v. Crystal, 15 Ohio St. 3d 326, 474 N.E.2d 275 (1984); Shearer v. Shearer, 18 Ohio St. 3d 9...
Child neglect and abandonment are serious problems in the United States. The number of children in f...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...
In light of the abrupt change in Ohio concerning the parental immunity doctrine, this comment will e...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...