Add to ORKGAre lawyers strangling our government’s ability to fight the first war of the twenty-first century? Does judicial adventurism and the fear of litigation undermine the War Against Terrorism? In essence, is our national security apparatus overlawyered? This article analyzes how some lawyers have produced a synthetic “litigation culture” over the war on terror. It argues that litigation concerning electronic surveillance, interrogation and all manners of prisoner treatment has chilled counterintelligence since 9/11
Ideological agendas distort the deliberation required for sound legal advice about national security...
This Article examines the United States\u27 response to the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al Qaeda f...
The United States is at war against al Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. Over the pas...
The attacks on September 11, 2001 marked the beginning of the War on Terror. A conclusive body of e...
The Obama administration has continued to apply the wartime paradigm first developed by the Bush adm...
Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, those arguing that international law cannot serve as an effect...
Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, national security law has exploded as a field of stu...
Law and the Global War on Terror On The Imperial Presidency and the Consequences of 9/11: Lawyers Re...
The events of September 11 changed how we perceive national security as a society, a government, and...
The debates about forums and processes for prosecuting those accused of terrorist acts have resonate...
The events of 9-11 presented western democracies with a challenge and a test. The challenge: respond...
This article assesses Canada\u27s principal legal responses to the challenge presented by terrorism ...
This article examines the role of the federal courts in the war on terrorism, and contrasts the diff...
This Article deals with one of the most difficult questions arising out of the war on terror: what t...
The time has come to extend the national approach that has been used successfully to dismantle the i...
Ideological agendas distort the deliberation required for sound legal advice about national security...
This Article examines the United States\u27 response to the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al Qaeda f...
The United States is at war against al Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. Over the pas...
The attacks on September 11, 2001 marked the beginning of the War on Terror. A conclusive body of e...
The Obama administration has continued to apply the wartime paradigm first developed by the Bush adm...
Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, those arguing that international law cannot serve as an effect...
Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, national security law has exploded as a field of stu...
Law and the Global War on Terror On The Imperial Presidency and the Consequences of 9/11: Lawyers Re...
The events of September 11 changed how we perceive national security as a society, a government, and...
The debates about forums and processes for prosecuting those accused of terrorist acts have resonate...
The events of 9-11 presented western democracies with a challenge and a test. The challenge: respond...
This article assesses Canada\u27s principal legal responses to the challenge presented by terrorism ...
This article examines the role of the federal courts in the war on terrorism, and contrasts the diff...
This Article deals with one of the most difficult questions arising out of the war on terror: what t...
The time has come to extend the national approach that has been used successfully to dismantle the i...
Ideological agendas distort the deliberation required for sound legal advice about national security...
This Article examines the United States\u27 response to the September 11, 2001 attacks by Al Qaeda f...
The United States is at war against al Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. Over the pas...