Add to ORKGProfessor Preis discusses Minneci v. Pollard, a case he argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on behalf of his client (Pollard), a federal prisoner who had brought a civil rights action for various forms of mistreatment in alleged violation of the Eighth Amendment. He outlines his and Pollard\u27s contention that federal courts should enforce the civil rights of prisoners without regard to the availability of equivalent tort relief under state common law
Courts have repeatedly declined to allow causes of actions under the Constitution when Plaintiffs’ c...
The 1960\u27s marked a watershed for the criminal justice system. In such areas as search and seizur...
The Supreme Court has long recognized that prisoners\u27 constitutional rights must be balanced agai...
In the 2012 case Minneci v. Pollard, the United States Supreme Court held that federal prisoners ass...
In Minneci v. Pollard, decided in January 2012, the Supreme Court refused to recognize a Bivens v. S...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.Interpreting recent Supreme Court precedent, th...
Plaintiff prisoners brought separate actions against the warden of the Oregon State Penitentiary, al...
The enforcement of the U.S. Constitution within the criminal justice system is an odd subspecies of ...
This Comment explores the conflict between two federal laws when prisoners challenging their confine...
American constitutional jurisprudence has long accepted the notion that the exercise of certain righ...
Inmates confined to correctional facilities have necessarily forfeited many of their civil rights. B...
Prisons and jails pose a significant challenge to the rule of law within American boundaries. As a n...
This Comment will address the inadequacy and injustice of the PLRA, specifically the “proper exhaust...
Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has resulted in limited scrutiny of solitary confinement despite the ...
In the early 1960s, the Supreme Court adopted generous standards governing federal habeas petitions ...
Courts have repeatedly declined to allow causes of actions under the Constitution when Plaintiffs’ c...
The 1960\u27s marked a watershed for the criminal justice system. In such areas as search and seizur...
The Supreme Court has long recognized that prisoners\u27 constitutional rights must be balanced agai...
In the 2012 case Minneci v. Pollard, the United States Supreme Court held that federal prisoners ass...
In Minneci v. Pollard, decided in January 2012, the Supreme Court refused to recognize a Bivens v. S...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.Interpreting recent Supreme Court precedent, th...
Plaintiff prisoners brought separate actions against the warden of the Oregon State Penitentiary, al...
The enforcement of the U.S. Constitution within the criminal justice system is an odd subspecies of ...
This Comment explores the conflict between two federal laws when prisoners challenging their confine...
American constitutional jurisprudence has long accepted the notion that the exercise of certain righ...
Inmates confined to correctional facilities have necessarily forfeited many of their civil rights. B...
Prisons and jails pose a significant challenge to the rule of law within American boundaries. As a n...
This Comment will address the inadequacy and injustice of the PLRA, specifically the “proper exhaust...
Eighth Amendment jurisprudence has resulted in limited scrutiny of solitary confinement despite the ...
In the early 1960s, the Supreme Court adopted generous standards governing federal habeas petitions ...
Courts have repeatedly declined to allow causes of actions under the Constitution when Plaintiffs’ c...
The 1960\u27s marked a watershed for the criminal justice system. In such areas as search and seizur...
The Supreme Court has long recognized that prisoners\u27 constitutional rights must be balanced agai...