Add to ORKGProfessor Perdue describes her use of materials on Indian Tribes at the end of her Conflict of Laws course as a vehicle for examining the interrelations among choice of law, Jurisdiction, and recognition of judgments. Her goal is not to make students experts in Indian law, but rather to get students to reexamine assumptions about the nature of sovereignty and the role of choice of law, jurisdiction, and recognition of judgments as devices for recognizing and allocating governmental authorit
This article is intended to rebut several of Mr. Brakel\u27s key assertions and to emphasize the wel...
An examination of the tribal courts\u27 civil jurisdiction and sovereign immunity decisions, and a r...
For the last thirty years the Supreme Court has been adjusting the boundaries of American Indian tri...
The author examines the three areas of law, tribal power, state jurisdiction, and equal protection, ...
This 1994 article explores how unspoken, underlying presumptions shifted in Supreme Court jurisprude...
The Indigenous nations of the United States have long been subject to federal policy. Since the Civi...
Federal law about Indian tribes tends to be considered separately from the body of law about federal...
While vigorous debate surrounds the proper scope and ambit of inherent tribal authority, there remai...
Public Law 280 was a piece of legislation that dramatically altered the landscape of federal Indian ...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
This Note examines the issue of tribal court jurisdiction over cases in which both Indians and non-I...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
This exploration reveals that tribes were not as anomalous as the Supreme Court of the United States...
This article considers a problem in Indian law that has been much commented upon but little explored...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
This article is intended to rebut several of Mr. Brakel\u27s key assertions and to emphasize the wel...
An examination of the tribal courts\u27 civil jurisdiction and sovereign immunity decisions, and a r...
For the last thirty years the Supreme Court has been adjusting the boundaries of American Indian tri...
The author examines the three areas of law, tribal power, state jurisdiction, and equal protection, ...
This 1994 article explores how unspoken, underlying presumptions shifted in Supreme Court jurisprude...
The Indigenous nations of the United States have long been subject to federal policy. Since the Civi...
Federal law about Indian tribes tends to be considered separately from the body of law about federal...
While vigorous debate surrounds the proper scope and ambit of inherent tribal authority, there remai...
Public Law 280 was a piece of legislation that dramatically altered the landscape of federal Indian ...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
This Note examines the issue of tribal court jurisdiction over cases in which both Indians and non-I...
The most recent Indian law case before the Supreme Court, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indi...
This exploration reveals that tribes were not as anomalous as the Supreme Court of the United States...
This article considers a problem in Indian law that has been much commented upon but little explored...
For a century and a half, the Supreme Court was faithful to a set of foundation principles respectin...
This article is intended to rebut several of Mr. Brakel\u27s key assertions and to emphasize the wel...
An examination of the tribal courts\u27 civil jurisdiction and sovereign immunity decisions, and a r...
For the last thirty years the Supreme Court has been adjusting the boundaries of American Indian tri...