Weiss-Wendt’s book unpacks what happened to “genocide” as it journeyed along this path of codification. To be clear, codification was conditioned by compromise among states; and states were often motivated by Cold War selfishness, spite, manipulation, and machination. The Convention narrowed—and even mangled—the set of protected groups to national, ethnic, racial, and religious. The Convention, moreover, limited the recognized forms that genocide could take. The title of Weiss-Wendt’s book reflects its argument that the expansiveness of genocide as an idea was “gutted” in the process of codifying it in an international treaty
Raphael Lemkin coined the word genocide and led a movement in the United Nations to outlaw the crime...
The Polish jurist Raphael Lemkin added the concept of genocide to our vocabulary barely seventy year...
In 1948, a mere four years after Raphael Lemkin coined the word “genocide,” the UN General Assembly ...
Every so often, in the broad history of the human world, a madman comes along with a plan for a ‘‘Ne...
Academics studying genocide are required, amid the exigency of predicting and preventing further ins...
The breadth and complexity of Lemkin’s definition of “genocide” results from several influences duri...
The following essay is based on a talk delivered at the UN during the American Bar Associations Conf...
Genocide may be the most recent crime to have been introduced into international criminal law, but i...
Law is commonly thought of as an antidote to genocide rather than its facilitator. In Holocaust, Gen...
Century of Genocide begins with the words ‘‘Will the killing ever stop?’’. This is a profound questi...
This Book Review uses Michael Barnett\u27s argument that the United Nations (UN) refrained from inte...
Genocidal violence in our times is expected to take new forms, given the actual problems of our soci...
Book review of Genocide: New Perspectives on Its Causes, Courses and Consequences
Between 1933 and 1945, some fourteen million civilians were killed by the Nazi and Soviet regimes as...
Legal debate about genocide revolves around the definition set forth in the 1948 Genocide Convention...
Raphael Lemkin coined the word genocide and led a movement in the United Nations to outlaw the crime...
The Polish jurist Raphael Lemkin added the concept of genocide to our vocabulary barely seventy year...
In 1948, a mere four years after Raphael Lemkin coined the word “genocide,” the UN General Assembly ...
Every so often, in the broad history of the human world, a madman comes along with a plan for a ‘‘Ne...
Academics studying genocide are required, amid the exigency of predicting and preventing further ins...
The breadth and complexity of Lemkin’s definition of “genocide” results from several influences duri...
The following essay is based on a talk delivered at the UN during the American Bar Associations Conf...
Genocide may be the most recent crime to have been introduced into international criminal law, but i...
Law is commonly thought of as an antidote to genocide rather than its facilitator. In Holocaust, Gen...
Century of Genocide begins with the words ‘‘Will the killing ever stop?’’. This is a profound questi...
This Book Review uses Michael Barnett\u27s argument that the United Nations (UN) refrained from inte...
Genocidal violence in our times is expected to take new forms, given the actual problems of our soci...
Book review of Genocide: New Perspectives on Its Causes, Courses and Consequences
Between 1933 and 1945, some fourteen million civilians were killed by the Nazi and Soviet regimes as...
Legal debate about genocide revolves around the definition set forth in the 1948 Genocide Convention...
Raphael Lemkin coined the word genocide and led a movement in the United Nations to outlaw the crime...
The Polish jurist Raphael Lemkin added the concept of genocide to our vocabulary barely seventy year...
In 1948, a mere four years after Raphael Lemkin coined the word “genocide,” the UN General Assembly ...