Political and philosophical theorists have often advocated for the exclusion of some or all religious perspectives from full participation in politics. Such approaches create criteria—such as public accessibility, public reason, or secular rationale—to legitimate such exclusion. During the 1990s I argued, as an evangelical Christian, against such exclusionary theories, defending the rights to full and equal political participation by evangelical Christians, traditionalist Roman Catholics, and any others who would be restricted by such criteria
The Supreme Court habitually justifies the Establishment Clause as a means to prevent political divi...
In liberal democracies such as America, the mixing of religion and politics is often thought to be p...
For at least the past decade or so, law-and-religion scholars have vigorously debated the issue of w...
The legal status of religion everywhere reflects the development ofreligious traditions and institu...
The current understanding of liberal democracy in many academic circles includes a set of restraints...
In addressing the role of religion in politics and law, American political theory has strongly embra...
This Essay responds to comments by Wayne Barnes, Ian Huyett, and David Smolin on my prior Article, S...
Religion is subject to both formal and informal constraints in its involvement in the political proc...
My thesis seeks to examine John Rawls\u27 concept of public reason as it applies to religion. Wherea...
Should citizens armed with religious reasons for public policy outcomes present those reasons in the...
Denominationalism appears to be an important factor in American politics, particularly in presidenti...
This Essay argues that it’s perfectly fine for religious citizens to openly bring their faith-based ...
Political theorists have long debated whether liberal democratic norms of public political debate sh...
In 1992, Patrick Buchanan ignited a firestorm of controversy when he exhorted the crowd at the Repub...
This Essay responds to comments by Samuel Calhoun, Wayne Barnes, and David Smolin, made as part of a...
The Supreme Court habitually justifies the Establishment Clause as a means to prevent political divi...
In liberal democracies such as America, the mixing of religion and politics is often thought to be p...
For at least the past decade or so, law-and-religion scholars have vigorously debated the issue of w...
The legal status of religion everywhere reflects the development ofreligious traditions and institu...
The current understanding of liberal democracy in many academic circles includes a set of restraints...
In addressing the role of religion in politics and law, American political theory has strongly embra...
This Essay responds to comments by Wayne Barnes, Ian Huyett, and David Smolin on my prior Article, S...
Religion is subject to both formal and informal constraints in its involvement in the political proc...
My thesis seeks to examine John Rawls\u27 concept of public reason as it applies to religion. Wherea...
Should citizens armed with religious reasons for public policy outcomes present those reasons in the...
Denominationalism appears to be an important factor in American politics, particularly in presidenti...
This Essay argues that it’s perfectly fine for religious citizens to openly bring their faith-based ...
Political theorists have long debated whether liberal democratic norms of public political debate sh...
In 1992, Patrick Buchanan ignited a firestorm of controversy when he exhorted the crowd at the Repub...
This Essay responds to comments by Samuel Calhoun, Wayne Barnes, and David Smolin, made as part of a...
The Supreme Court habitually justifies the Establishment Clause as a means to prevent political divi...
In liberal democracies such as America, the mixing of religion and politics is often thought to be p...
For at least the past decade or so, law-and-religion scholars have vigorously debated the issue of w...