This essay suggests that there is an instructive incompleteness in Judge Posner\u27s transition from scientific observer to legal actor. His legal skepticism should be understood as a legacy of his days as an inquiring economist, observing and forming beliefs about law and the judicial process from the academy. His affirmation of judicial practices stems from his new respect for practical reason, which seems to result from the experience of performing judicial duties. This essay will argue that a more complete assimilation of the practical perspective of the legal actor would undercut Judge Posner\u27s arguments for legal skepticism
A current focus of legal debate is the proper role of the courts in the interpretation of statutes a...
Book review of The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. By Richard A. Posner. Harvard University ...
How to sum up a corpus of opinions that spans dozens of legal fields and four decades on the bench? ...
The skeptical vein in American thinking about law runs from Holmes to the legal realists to the crit...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
Over the past twenty odd years, Judge Richard Posner has established himself as one of the most crea...
This essay celebrates judicial instigators, and Judge Richard Posner as instigator. It embraces a vi...
Judge Richard A. Posner has expanded the scope of his writing. We have previously known him as one o...
Judge Richard Posner\u27s well-known view is that constitutional theory is useless. And Judge J Harv...
In this Madison Lecture, Chief Judge Posner advocates a pragmatic approach to constitutional decisio...
Judge Richard Posner’s well-known view is that constitutional theory is useless. And Judge J. Harvie...
The basic questions that Practical Legal Studies confronts are how judges decide cases and how judge...
In law, problems of interpretation can be explored at different levels of generality. At the most sp...
The world is complex, Richard Posner observes in his most recent book, Reflections on Judging. It fo...
A current focus of legal debate is the proper role of the courts in the interpretation of statutes a...
Book review of The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. By Richard A. Posner. Harvard University ...
How to sum up a corpus of opinions that spans dozens of legal fields and four decades on the bench? ...
The skeptical vein in American thinking about law runs from Holmes to the legal realists to the crit...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
Over the past twenty odd years, Judge Richard Posner has established himself as one of the most crea...
This essay celebrates judicial instigators, and Judge Richard Posner as instigator. It embraces a vi...
Judge Richard A. Posner has expanded the scope of his writing. We have previously known him as one o...
Judge Richard Posner\u27s well-known view is that constitutional theory is useless. And Judge J Harv...
In this Madison Lecture, Chief Judge Posner advocates a pragmatic approach to constitutional decisio...
Judge Richard Posner’s well-known view is that constitutional theory is useless. And Judge J. Harvie...
The basic questions that Practical Legal Studies confronts are how judges decide cases and how judge...
In law, problems of interpretation can be explored at different levels of generality. At the most sp...
The world is complex, Richard Posner observes in his most recent book, Reflections on Judging. It fo...
A current focus of legal debate is the proper role of the courts in the interpretation of statutes a...
Book review of The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. By Richard A. Posner. Harvard University ...
How to sum up a corpus of opinions that spans dozens of legal fields and four decades on the bench? ...