Add to ORKGThis article employs the techniques of the social sciences in testing a legal proposition. After setting forth the hypotheses and methodology utilized by the experiment discussed herein, it presents the results obtained by examining the deliberations of different-sized juries concerning the same civil litigation. This article does not purport to be definitive; it does, however, attempt to indicate one methodology of interdisciplinary research which can be undertaken and the utility of this research to both the social sciences and the legal profession
An analysis of mock jury deliberations indicated that juries could competently evaluate facts, weed ...
Two experiments examined individual and group decision mak-ing when decision criteria led to outcome...
Empirical research demonstrates that jurors have difficulty understanding and following traditional ...
This article employs the techniques of the social sciences in testing a legal proposition. After set...
Researchers in the behavioral sciences have watched with some pride as the courts have given increas...
The most convincing basis for criticism of the Supreme Court\u27s conclusion that there is no disce...
Inside the Juror presents the most interesting and sophisticated work to date on juror decision maki...
In this article, the way that the jury works is considered from a group-analytic perspective. Obser...
My focus today will be on the twelve-person unanimous jury and on the contrasts between such juries ...
This article reviews some of the studies relating to jury decision making and the drafting of jury i...
In the past, there have been three major approaches to the experimental investigation of the jury. F...
Quantitative research has dominated applied litigation research, but it seems to lack the flexibilit...
Support is growing for increased use of six-member juries in civil cases. Presently, a jury with les...
Fully participatory jury deliberations figure prominently in the idealized view of the American jury...
Much of the extant research on jury decision making has been conducted at the juror level, examining...
An analysis of mock jury deliberations indicated that juries could competently evaluate facts, weed ...
Two experiments examined individual and group decision mak-ing when decision criteria led to outcome...
Empirical research demonstrates that jurors have difficulty understanding and following traditional ...
This article employs the techniques of the social sciences in testing a legal proposition. After set...
Researchers in the behavioral sciences have watched with some pride as the courts have given increas...
The most convincing basis for criticism of the Supreme Court\u27s conclusion that there is no disce...
Inside the Juror presents the most interesting and sophisticated work to date on juror decision maki...
In this article, the way that the jury works is considered from a group-analytic perspective. Obser...
My focus today will be on the twelve-person unanimous jury and on the contrasts between such juries ...
This article reviews some of the studies relating to jury decision making and the drafting of jury i...
In the past, there have been three major approaches to the experimental investigation of the jury. F...
Quantitative research has dominated applied litigation research, but it seems to lack the flexibilit...
Support is growing for increased use of six-member juries in civil cases. Presently, a jury with les...
Fully participatory jury deliberations figure prominently in the idealized view of the American jury...
Much of the extant research on jury decision making has been conducted at the juror level, examining...
An analysis of mock jury deliberations indicated that juries could competently evaluate facts, weed ...
Two experiments examined individual and group decision mak-ing when decision criteria led to outcome...
Empirical research demonstrates that jurors have difficulty understanding and following traditional ...