The recent litigation explosion presents a two-pronged dilemma for American appellate courts. If, on the one hand, the number of appellate judges is not expanded to keep abreast of growing case loads, there is a risk that courts will rely too heavily on professional staff, thereby watering down the decision-making process. If, on the other hand, the number of judges is proportionately increased with the growth in appellate litigation, the number of three-judge decisional units will also increase, thereby threatening predictability and uniformity in the law of the jurisdiction. This Article undertakes to explain that dilemma and to offer a solution for it
The field of complex litigation continues to grow as both an academic study and a popular phenomenon...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...
The recent litigation explosion presents a two-pronged dilemma for American appellate courts. If, on...
This edition promises to redefine the canon of the study of appellate courts, continuing the compreh...
Appellate review can be understood as an opportunity to correct errors made by lower courts and, by ...
A Review of Rationing Justice on Appeal: The Problems of the U.S. Courts of Appeals by Thomas E. Ba...
As the number of cases filed each year has surged, U.S. federal appellate courts have evolved in ord...
According to a number of studies and commentators, a serious caseload crisis faces the federal court...
Many of the other Articles in this Symposium demonstrate that a single great piece of legal scholars...
Growth in the appellate caseload in the United States has caused a substantial increase in the numbe...
Elitism, Expediency, and the New Certiorari: Requiem for the Learned Hand Tradition is a thought-pro...
Every appellate decision typically begins with the standard of appellate review. The Supreme Court h...
Lawyers make four critical mistakes in current appellate practice. First, many appellants\u27 lawyer...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...
The field of complex litigation continues to grow as both an academic study and a popular phenomenon...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...
The recent litigation explosion presents a two-pronged dilemma for American appellate courts. If, on...
This edition promises to redefine the canon of the study of appellate courts, continuing the compreh...
Appellate review can be understood as an opportunity to correct errors made by lower courts and, by ...
A Review of Rationing Justice on Appeal: The Problems of the U.S. Courts of Appeals by Thomas E. Ba...
As the number of cases filed each year has surged, U.S. federal appellate courts have evolved in ord...
According to a number of studies and commentators, a serious caseload crisis faces the federal court...
Many of the other Articles in this Symposium demonstrate that a single great piece of legal scholars...
Growth in the appellate caseload in the United States has caused a substantial increase in the numbe...
Elitism, Expediency, and the New Certiorari: Requiem for the Learned Hand Tradition is a thought-pro...
Every appellate decision typically begins with the standard of appellate review. The Supreme Court h...
Lawyers make four critical mistakes in current appellate practice. First, many appellants\u27 lawyer...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...
The field of complex litigation continues to grow as both an academic study and a popular phenomenon...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...