One can only hope, to put it bluntly, that the Supreme Court majority in Villamonte-Marquez did not mean what it seemed to have said. Indeed, there is some evidence that this is precisely the case. In the same Term Villamonte-Marquez was decided, the Court also decided Texas v. Brown. In Brown, the Supreme Court continued to recognize and respond to the problem of pretext searches. In other words, the Court still acts as if the pretext search doctrine remains vital, despite the apparent body blow delivered to it in Scott and Villamonte-Marquez. The remainder of this Article elaborates upon the points sketched above, once again attempting to sound the alarm about the destruction of the pretext search doctrine, this time with just a bit mo...
A long-standing debate has surrounded the relationship between two features of the Fourth Amendment\...
This article is about the Supreme Court\u27s consent search doctrine. Part I describes how the law o...
For 28 years the Court held that an officer\u27s search incident to arrest powers automatically exte...
This Article first analyzes the debate between Professors John M. Burkoff and James B. Haddad over t...
Pretextual detentions, arrests, and searches pose knotty fourth amendment problems. With an air of p...
This Article discusses the issue of pretext and whether evidence discovered by way of a pretext viol...
This Article contends the Supreme Court\u27s use of a primary purpose test to regulate suspicionless...
This Article will reflect on (1) how the Whren v. United States failure to acknowledge what counts a...
Despite numerous attempts to subject the use of pretext law enforcement stops to Alaska Constitution...
It is inescapable: there is a presumption in favor of preemption. Historically, the Supreme Court ha...
In Whren v. United States, the United States Supreme Court held that a traffic stop is reasonable un...
This Article examines the problems with the Supreme Court\u27s holding in Kelo v. City of New London...
Professor Burkoff contends that most people who purportedly “consent” to searches by law enforcement...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search incident to a valid arrest for a traffic viol...
The United States Supreme Court in United States v. Ross vastly simplified the process of searching ...
A long-standing debate has surrounded the relationship between two features of the Fourth Amendment\...
This article is about the Supreme Court\u27s consent search doctrine. Part I describes how the law o...
For 28 years the Court held that an officer\u27s search incident to arrest powers automatically exte...
This Article first analyzes the debate between Professors John M. Burkoff and James B. Haddad over t...
Pretextual detentions, arrests, and searches pose knotty fourth amendment problems. With an air of p...
This Article discusses the issue of pretext and whether evidence discovered by way of a pretext viol...
This Article contends the Supreme Court\u27s use of a primary purpose test to regulate suspicionless...
This Article will reflect on (1) how the Whren v. United States failure to acknowledge what counts a...
Despite numerous attempts to subject the use of pretext law enforcement stops to Alaska Constitution...
It is inescapable: there is a presumption in favor of preemption. Historically, the Supreme Court ha...
In Whren v. United States, the United States Supreme Court held that a traffic stop is reasonable un...
This Article examines the problems with the Supreme Court\u27s holding in Kelo v. City of New London...
Professor Burkoff contends that most people who purportedly “consent” to searches by law enforcement...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search incident to a valid arrest for a traffic viol...
The United States Supreme Court in United States v. Ross vastly simplified the process of searching ...
A long-standing debate has surrounded the relationship between two features of the Fourth Amendment\...
This article is about the Supreme Court\u27s consent search doctrine. Part I describes how the law o...
For 28 years the Court held that an officer\u27s search incident to arrest powers automatically exte...