This Note examines the conflicting authority regarding the scope of section 502(a) of ERISA. There is a fundamental split among the United States Courts of Appeals concerning whether parties not specifically enumerated in section 502(a) have standing to bring civil actions to enforce ERISA\u27s provisions. The Ninth Circuit has held consistently that non-enumerated parties are entitled to sue under ERISA. The Second Circuit, however, repeatedly has held that parties not explicitly specified in section 502(a). do not have standing to bring an action under the Act. This Note addresses the question of whether employers and pension funds, as non-enumerated parties, have standing under ERISA
This Article has two aims: first, to show that there is indeed little to guide courts in interpretin...
In order to develop the federal common law of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (E...
Congress attempted to encourage the growth of private employee benefit plans by drafting the preempt...
This Note examines whether courts should require section 510 claimants to exhaust either plan-based ...
The Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) 2 provides a regulatory scheme for the...
Before 1974, participants in employer retirement plans seeking monetary relief for denied benefits w...
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act ( ERISA ) is a federal law that protects participants of...
On June 22, 2011, in Cyr v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
This Article begins by explaining the problem confronting the participant in the benefits-due lawsui...
Waivers affecting pension benefits may be entered into as part of a controversy (for example, a sett...
Fiduciary duty principles are central to the protection provided by the Employee Retirement Income S...
Current scholarly writings concerning the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 ( ERISA ) have no...
ERISA recites in § 502(d)(1) that a plan can sue and be sued as an entity. Does such a legislative p...
The comprehensive federal scheme for regulating pension and other employee benefit plans, ERISA, is ...
Over the past twenty years, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that arbitration agreements and cl...
This Article has two aims: first, to show that there is indeed little to guide courts in interpretin...
In order to develop the federal common law of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (E...
Congress attempted to encourage the growth of private employee benefit plans by drafting the preempt...
This Note examines whether courts should require section 510 claimants to exhaust either plan-based ...
The Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) 2 provides a regulatory scheme for the...
Before 1974, participants in employer retirement plans seeking monetary relief for denied benefits w...
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act ( ERISA ) is a federal law that protects participants of...
On June 22, 2011, in Cyr v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
This Article begins by explaining the problem confronting the participant in the benefits-due lawsui...
Waivers affecting pension benefits may be entered into as part of a controversy (for example, a sett...
Fiduciary duty principles are central to the protection provided by the Employee Retirement Income S...
Current scholarly writings concerning the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 ( ERISA ) have no...
ERISA recites in § 502(d)(1) that a plan can sue and be sued as an entity. Does such a legislative p...
The comprehensive federal scheme for regulating pension and other employee benefit plans, ERISA, is ...
Over the past twenty years, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that arbitration agreements and cl...
This Article has two aims: first, to show that there is indeed little to guide courts in interpretin...
In order to develop the federal common law of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (E...
Congress attempted to encourage the growth of private employee benefit plans by drafting the preempt...