Part I of this Article describes some of the risks and benefits of newly emerging agricultural biotechnologies. After discussing, in Part II, the role of federal agencies in regulating agricultural biotechnologies, Part III of the Article proposes elements for an adequate regulatory regime. Part IV then measures the existing legal authorities, as implemented by the USDA and the EPA, against the ideal elements. Part V examines the willingness of these agencies to regulate. Finally, Part VI suggests changes that can be made in the current regulatory regime to bring about more effective regulation and to enhance public trust in regulatory decisions
The federal government’s regulatory approach to genetically engineered (GE) crops, known as “The Fra...
Millions of agricultural producers from around the globe now cultivate genetically modified (GM) cro...
The seed industry has routinely incorporated new technology into its research and development progra...
Part I of this Article describes some of the risks and benefits of newly emerging agricultural biote...
This essay first presents an overview of key legal principles that support sustainability. This essa...
This Article describes and evaluates the existing federal regulatory regime for protecting public he...
The federal regulation of biotechnology is governed by a comprehensive policy recently promulgated b...
Although GM crops are cultivated on 175 million hectares in 27 countries, the regulation of agricult...
Since the 1980s, successive White House Administrations have shaped federal policy on genetically mo...
This paper evaluates the U.S. regulatory review of three emerging biotechnology products according t...
We enthusiastically support Philip H. Abelson’s call for substantially increased funding for basic a...
Genome editing for crop improvement lies at the leading edge of disruptive bioengineering technologi...
Three federal agencies -- the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Environmental Protecti...
Small procedural changes in how regulatory agencies implement biotech policies can make significant ...
Greg Simon (Letters, 3 May, p. 629) makes the case that only federal regulation of releases of agric...
The federal government’s regulatory approach to genetically engineered (GE) crops, known as “The Fra...
Millions of agricultural producers from around the globe now cultivate genetically modified (GM) cro...
The seed industry has routinely incorporated new technology into its research and development progra...
Part I of this Article describes some of the risks and benefits of newly emerging agricultural biote...
This essay first presents an overview of key legal principles that support sustainability. This essa...
This Article describes and evaluates the existing federal regulatory regime for protecting public he...
The federal regulation of biotechnology is governed by a comprehensive policy recently promulgated b...
Although GM crops are cultivated on 175 million hectares in 27 countries, the regulation of agricult...
Since the 1980s, successive White House Administrations have shaped federal policy on genetically mo...
This paper evaluates the U.S. regulatory review of three emerging biotechnology products according t...
We enthusiastically support Philip H. Abelson’s call for substantially increased funding for basic a...
Genome editing for crop improvement lies at the leading edge of disruptive bioengineering technologi...
Three federal agencies -- the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Environmental Protecti...
Small procedural changes in how regulatory agencies implement biotech policies can make significant ...
Greg Simon (Letters, 3 May, p. 629) makes the case that only federal regulation of releases of agric...
The federal government’s regulatory approach to genetically engineered (GE) crops, known as “The Fra...
Millions of agricultural producers from around the globe now cultivate genetically modified (GM) cro...
The seed industry has routinely incorporated new technology into its research and development progra...