I agree with Judge Edwards that the lawyer has an ethical obligation to practice public interest law - to represent some poor clients; to advance some causes that he or she believes to be just. I also concur in Judge Edwards\u27 opinion that [a] person who deploys his or her doctrinal skill without concern for the public interest is merely a good legal technician - not a good lawyer. Rather than further develop Judge Edwards\u27 theme that lawyers have a professional responsibility to do pro bono work, I will offer another rationale for such work, grounded in professional and individual self-interest. Specifically, my major theme is that, by serving the public, lawyers can simultaneously do well and do good. In other words, by doing pro...