Dear Harry: I write to second your statements concerning the disjunction between legal education and the legal profession and also to quibble with you. By examining the faculty, the curriculum, and the research agenda at Michigan, your school and mine, I hope to illustrate the ways in which you are right and to suggest other ways in which you and your clerk informants may be too pessimistic
Harry Edwards and I both finished law school in 1965, and his article presents an occasion to consid...
Judge Harry Edwards dislikes empirical work that is not flattering to federal appellate judges. We b...
In this essay I offer a postscript to The Growing Disjunction. It is not possible for me to respo...
Dear Harry: I write to second your statements concerning the disjunction between legal education and...
With characteristic vigor, Judge Harry Edwards, in his essay The Growing Disjunction Between Legal E...
Perhaps this little piece should be entitled Grace Notes rather than Commentary because I agree with...
Discussion of Judge Harry Edwards\u27 article continues, and faculty respond with thoughts on theory
The life of Judge Harry T. Edwards is one very much steeped in writing. His passion dates back at le...
Until fairly recently, the work of people who thought and wrote about the law in its broadest cultur...
In his article on the growing disjunction between law schools and law practice, Judge Harry Edwards ...
One of the many virtues of Judge Harry Edwards\u27 very interesting polemic is that it issues an ope...
Judge Edwards divides his analysis of the cause of the crisis in ethical lawyering into an overview ...
Judge Edwards\u27 lively essay declaims what he regards as the increasing disjunction between the su...
The editors have asked me to comment on Judge Edwards\u27 double-barreled blast at legal education a...
This article is my response to Professor Priest and all other legal academicians who disdain law tea...
Harry Edwards and I both finished law school in 1965, and his article presents an occasion to consid...
Judge Harry Edwards dislikes empirical work that is not flattering to federal appellate judges. We b...
In this essay I offer a postscript to The Growing Disjunction. It is not possible for me to respo...
Dear Harry: I write to second your statements concerning the disjunction between legal education and...
With characteristic vigor, Judge Harry Edwards, in his essay The Growing Disjunction Between Legal E...
Perhaps this little piece should be entitled Grace Notes rather than Commentary because I agree with...
Discussion of Judge Harry Edwards\u27 article continues, and faculty respond with thoughts on theory
The life of Judge Harry T. Edwards is one very much steeped in writing. His passion dates back at le...
Until fairly recently, the work of people who thought and wrote about the law in its broadest cultur...
In his article on the growing disjunction between law schools and law practice, Judge Harry Edwards ...
One of the many virtues of Judge Harry Edwards\u27 very interesting polemic is that it issues an ope...
Judge Edwards divides his analysis of the cause of the crisis in ethical lawyering into an overview ...
Judge Edwards\u27 lively essay declaims what he regards as the increasing disjunction between the su...
The editors have asked me to comment on Judge Edwards\u27 double-barreled blast at legal education a...
This article is my response to Professor Priest and all other legal academicians who disdain law tea...
Harry Edwards and I both finished law school in 1965, and his article presents an occasion to consid...
Judge Harry Edwards dislikes empirical work that is not flattering to federal appellate judges. We b...
In this essay I offer a postscript to The Growing Disjunction. It is not possible for me to respo...