The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) was enacted to protect servicemembers from discrimination by civilian employers and to provide servicemembers with reemployment rights. Recent circuit court decisions, however, have maimed these protections by ruling that mandatory arbitration is permissible under USERRA. This Note argues that such rulings conflict with USERRA’s plain language, statutory structure, and purpose. Ultimately, in light of strong public policy considerations, this Note contends that mandatory arbitration should not be permissible under USERRA and proposes that Congress amend the Act to explicitly prohibit arbitration
Mandatory arbitration as used here means that employees must agree as a condition of employment to ...
A law can often be a double-edged sword—its mandate or protection of one right will sometimes come a...
The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act (AFA) would prohibit all pre-dispute agreements to arbitrate i...
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) was enacted to protect servic...
American servicemembers are returning from the battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq to find that the...
According to the United States Supreme Court, statutory claims may be the subject of an arbitration ...
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) is the most comprehensive fed...
In August 2008 a bill was introduced in the United States Senate that clearly states Uniformed Servi...
This Note assesses Milhauser’s impact on reemployment claims under USERRA. Part II begins with an an...
This Comment examines the statutory history of military reservists\u27 rights, and takes a critical ...
As more Reserve and National Guard troops are called to leave the civilian workforce and enter milit...
As support for arbitration clauses began to grow, employers began to include arbitration clauses in ...
When Public Act 312 became effective on October 1, 1969, Michigan joined Rhode Island and Pennsylvan...
Two federal laws offer employment protections specifically to service members and their families. Th...
In a country that protects the plaintiff\u27s right to a day in court, it only seems natural that Sa...
Mandatory arbitration as used here means that employees must agree as a condition of employment to ...
A law can often be a double-edged sword—its mandate or protection of one right will sometimes come a...
The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act (AFA) would prohibit all pre-dispute agreements to arbitrate i...
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) was enacted to protect servic...
American servicemembers are returning from the battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq to find that the...
According to the United States Supreme Court, statutory claims may be the subject of an arbitration ...
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) is the most comprehensive fed...
In August 2008 a bill was introduced in the United States Senate that clearly states Uniformed Servi...
This Note assesses Milhauser’s impact on reemployment claims under USERRA. Part II begins with an an...
This Comment examines the statutory history of military reservists\u27 rights, and takes a critical ...
As more Reserve and National Guard troops are called to leave the civilian workforce and enter milit...
As support for arbitration clauses began to grow, employers began to include arbitration clauses in ...
When Public Act 312 became effective on October 1, 1969, Michigan joined Rhode Island and Pennsylvan...
Two federal laws offer employment protections specifically to service members and their families. Th...
In a country that protects the plaintiff\u27s right to a day in court, it only seems natural that Sa...
Mandatory arbitration as used here means that employees must agree as a condition of employment to ...
A law can often be a double-edged sword—its mandate or protection of one right will sometimes come a...
The proposed Arbitration Fairness Act (AFA) would prohibit all pre-dispute agreements to arbitrate i...