The author prefaces the afterword in the following manner: “Professors Goldsmith and Posner have given an insightful reply to my Article. It has been a pleasure to engage in a discussion of these issues with respected colleagues via this exchange of writings, and I am grateful to the Journal for providing the opportunity to do so. Most of the positions I have taken are already adequately discussed in the body of the Article, and this afterword is not intended to summarize all of the arguments made there. However, I wanted to address some of the points Professors Goldsmith and Posner make in their reply. I have organized this afterword using their numbering.
In a pair of recent articles, Professors Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner have used game theoretic pri...
This issue of the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law includes two presentations to the 1972 Sym...
It is a privilege for me to have received the attention to my latest book of such a trio of expertis...
In the introductory essay, I sought to apply The Art of Law in the International Community as a resp...
In \u27The Limits of International Law,\u27 Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner use the simplifying assum...
In two earlier articles, the tools of game theory were used to sketch a positive theoretical account...
Thanks to the Harvard International Law Journal for hosting a symposium on my Article and to the fou...
Reviews Eric A. Posner, The Perils of Global Legalism; Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works...
In the foregoing article, Professor D\u27Amato has taken issue with a number of arguments I raised i...
The Articles and Comments in this Volume cover a wide range of topics. Appropriately, each one uses ...
Joan E. Donoghue\u27s theories regarding the prospects for a convention on foreign state immunity wi...
Professor Weisburd\u27s reply to my essay adds helpful insights to the fascinating issue of the impa...
Arthur M. Weisburd\u27s article, Customary International Law: The Problem of Treaties , focuses on ...
This is a review essay of Eric Posner and Jack Goldsmith\u27s fascinating book, The Limits of Intern...
Brad Roth\u27s response to my Review of his book seeks to privilege his approach to international la...
In a pair of recent articles, Professors Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner have used game theoretic pri...
This issue of the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law includes two presentations to the 1972 Sym...
It is a privilege for me to have received the attention to my latest book of such a trio of expertis...
In the introductory essay, I sought to apply The Art of Law in the International Community as a resp...
In \u27The Limits of International Law,\u27 Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner use the simplifying assum...
In two earlier articles, the tools of game theory were used to sketch a positive theoretical account...
Thanks to the Harvard International Law Journal for hosting a symposium on my Article and to the fou...
Reviews Eric A. Posner, The Perils of Global Legalism; Andrew T. Guzman, How International Law Works...
In the foregoing article, Professor D\u27Amato has taken issue with a number of arguments I raised i...
The Articles and Comments in this Volume cover a wide range of topics. Appropriately, each one uses ...
Joan E. Donoghue\u27s theories regarding the prospects for a convention on foreign state immunity wi...
Professor Weisburd\u27s reply to my essay adds helpful insights to the fascinating issue of the impa...
Arthur M. Weisburd\u27s article, Customary International Law: The Problem of Treaties , focuses on ...
This is a review essay of Eric Posner and Jack Goldsmith\u27s fascinating book, The Limits of Intern...
Brad Roth\u27s response to my Review of his book seeks to privilege his approach to international la...
In a pair of recent articles, Professors Jack Goldsmith and Eric Posner have used game theoretic pri...
This issue of the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law includes two presentations to the 1972 Sym...
It is a privilege for me to have received the attention to my latest book of such a trio of expertis...