In recent decades, the distinction between justification and excuse defenses has been a favorite topic of theorists of philosophy and criminal law. Notwithstanding the impressive intellectual efforts devoted to the task, no single scholar or viewpoint appears to be on the verge of generating practical consensus about the concepts of justification and excuse, categorization of the defenses, or categorization of difficult individual cases. This Essay suggests that none of these goals can be usefully advanced through the justification/excuse distinction
This article examines the question of criminal liability in terms of the theoretical distinction bet...
In this Essay, I evaluate the evidence of adequate nonprovocation” that Fontaine puts forward to sh...
The goal of this article is to rethink the relationship between the concepts of justification and wr...
Anglo-American theorists of the criminal law have concentrated on-one is tempted to say obsessed ov...
Legal theorists commonly employ a distinction between justification defenses and excuse defenses, bu...
Criminal law theory made a significant advance roughly thirty years ago when George Fletcher popular...
Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other...
The mother lode of criminal law scholarship is a unitary theory of excuses, that is, a normative acc...
Ever since J. L. Austin's famous "plea for excuses," if not before, the standard account of the dist...
This short essay, part of the Criminal Law Conversations project, argues for an objective formulatio...
The distinction between justifications and excuses is a familiar one to most of us who work either i...
This essay addresses the current criminal law debates about excusing by canvassing the issues and ar...
Criminal law excuses are analyzed as a group of analogous doctrines working together to exculpate bl...
Marcia Baron has offered an illuminating and fruitful discussion of extra-legal excuses. What is par...
Ann swings her arm and injures Ben. She faces moral condemnation and legal liability unless she can ...
This article examines the question of criminal liability in terms of the theoretical distinction bet...
In this Essay, I evaluate the evidence of adequate nonprovocation” that Fontaine puts forward to sh...
The goal of this article is to rethink the relationship between the concepts of justification and wr...
Anglo-American theorists of the criminal law have concentrated on-one is tempted to say obsessed ov...
Legal theorists commonly employ a distinction between justification defenses and excuse defenses, bu...
Criminal law theory made a significant advance roughly thirty years ago when George Fletcher popular...
Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other...
The mother lode of criminal law scholarship is a unitary theory of excuses, that is, a normative acc...
Ever since J. L. Austin's famous "plea for excuses," if not before, the standard account of the dist...
This short essay, part of the Criminal Law Conversations project, argues for an objective formulatio...
The distinction between justifications and excuses is a familiar one to most of us who work either i...
This essay addresses the current criminal law debates about excusing by canvassing the issues and ar...
Criminal law excuses are analyzed as a group of analogous doctrines working together to exculpate bl...
Marcia Baron has offered an illuminating and fruitful discussion of extra-legal excuses. What is par...
Ann swings her arm and injures Ben. She faces moral condemnation and legal liability unless she can ...
This article examines the question of criminal liability in terms of the theoretical distinction bet...
In this Essay, I evaluate the evidence of adequate nonprovocation” that Fontaine puts forward to sh...
The goal of this article is to rethink the relationship between the concepts of justification and wr...