Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure limits the territorial jurisdiction of federal district courts to that of the courts of their host states. This limitation is a voluntary rather than obligatory restriction, given district courts\u27 status as courts of the national sovereign. Although there are sound policy reasons for limiting the jurisdictional reach of our federal courts in this manner, the limitation delivers little benefit from a judicial administration or even a fairness perspective, and ultimately costs more to implement than is gained in return. The rule should be amended to provide that district courts have personal jurisdiction over all defendants who have constitutionally sufficient contacts with the United States, ...
No coherent or cohesive procedure or theory has emerged either in regard to the entire question of p...
On multiple occasions, I have advocated for a revision to Rule 4(k) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pr...
Personal jurisdiction has always constrained plaintiffs¿ access to courts, and recent Supreme Court ...
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure limits the territorial jurisdiction of federal distri...
Federal courts exercise the sovereign authority of the United States when they assert personal juris...
Twenty years ago, in a clear break with accepted theory, it was suggested that there were certain co...
Every litigator who remembers first year civil procedure knows that the personal jurisdiction1 of fe...
This Article seeks to show that the Supreme Court was correct in its implicit assertion in World- Wi...
After briefly cataloging the types of federal court cases that raise difficult conceptual issues reg...
With the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938, Congress finally attempted to pro...
Commentators have routinely noted the complexity, opacity, and multiple functions of U.S. personal j...
State-court personal jurisdiction is regulated intensely by the Fourteenth Amend-ment’s Due Process ...
Personal jurisdiction doctrine is broken, but there is a moment of opportunity to repair it. The Sup...
Personal jurisdiction doctrine as articulated by the Supreme Court is in disarray.A s a constitution...
The time has come for the Supreme Court to declare that a state may not apply its own law to a case ...
No coherent or cohesive procedure or theory has emerged either in regard to the entire question of p...
On multiple occasions, I have advocated for a revision to Rule 4(k) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pr...
Personal jurisdiction has always constrained plaintiffs¿ access to courts, and recent Supreme Court ...
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure limits the territorial jurisdiction of federal distri...
Federal courts exercise the sovereign authority of the United States when they assert personal juris...
Twenty years ago, in a clear break with accepted theory, it was suggested that there were certain co...
Every litigator who remembers first year civil procedure knows that the personal jurisdiction1 of fe...
This Article seeks to show that the Supreme Court was correct in its implicit assertion in World- Wi...
After briefly cataloging the types of federal court cases that raise difficult conceptual issues reg...
With the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938, Congress finally attempted to pro...
Commentators have routinely noted the complexity, opacity, and multiple functions of U.S. personal j...
State-court personal jurisdiction is regulated intensely by the Fourteenth Amend-ment’s Due Process ...
Personal jurisdiction doctrine is broken, but there is a moment of opportunity to repair it. The Sup...
Personal jurisdiction doctrine as articulated by the Supreme Court is in disarray.A s a constitution...
The time has come for the Supreme Court to declare that a state may not apply its own law to a case ...
No coherent or cohesive procedure or theory has emerged either in regard to the entire question of p...
On multiple occasions, I have advocated for a revision to Rule 4(k) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pr...
Personal jurisdiction has always constrained plaintiffs¿ access to courts, and recent Supreme Court ...