Though narrow in scope, this article is emphatic in its message. It is time to deny immunity to foreign sovereigns for torture, genocide, or enslavement, at least when they are sued by Americans in American courts. Such a denial would be consonant with two developments that have marked international law since World War II: the restriction of sovereign immunity and the expansion of human rights protection
The door may be closed (for now) on lifting state immunity for human rights violations on the basis ...
State immunity is an inalienable concept in international law designed to prevent abuses of inter-St...
This Article suggests that the rationale underlying the Nazi persecution and genocide provisions of ...
The scope of this article, like the one to which it responds, is limited. It does not purport to res...
This article challenges the claims made by the United States that the civil rights system in this co...
For thirty years, international human rights litigation in U.S. courts has developed with little att...
This thesis addresses the complicated and controversial relationship between the international doctr...
The scope of this article, like the one to which it responds, is limited. It does not purport to res...
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) was enacted in 1976 and provides the sole b...
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) was enacted in 1976 and provides the sole b...
This Comment examines whether the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act is amenable to the claims of alie...
The quest to bring human rights abusers to justice is a challenge wrought with legal obstacles. One ...
Government officials accused of human rights abuses often claim that they are protected by state imm...
Ch. 1. Introduction. I. The Problem of State Immunity in General. II. State Acts Constituting Torts ...
This is a comment on an article by Professor Burt Neuborne, in which he describes in detail the Holo...
The door may be closed (for now) on lifting state immunity for human rights violations on the basis ...
State immunity is an inalienable concept in international law designed to prevent abuses of inter-St...
This Article suggests that the rationale underlying the Nazi persecution and genocide provisions of ...
The scope of this article, like the one to which it responds, is limited. It does not purport to res...
This article challenges the claims made by the United States that the civil rights system in this co...
For thirty years, international human rights litigation in U.S. courts has developed with little att...
This thesis addresses the complicated and controversial relationship between the international doctr...
The scope of this article, like the one to which it responds, is limited. It does not purport to res...
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) was enacted in 1976 and provides the sole b...
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) was enacted in 1976 and provides the sole b...
This Comment examines whether the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act is amenable to the claims of alie...
The quest to bring human rights abusers to justice is a challenge wrought with legal obstacles. One ...
Government officials accused of human rights abuses often claim that they are protected by state imm...
Ch. 1. Introduction. I. The Problem of State Immunity in General. II. State Acts Constituting Torts ...
This is a comment on an article by Professor Burt Neuborne, in which he describes in detail the Holo...
The door may be closed (for now) on lifting state immunity for human rights violations on the basis ...
State immunity is an inalienable concept in international law designed to prevent abuses of inter-St...
This Article suggests that the rationale underlying the Nazi persecution and genocide provisions of ...